There is no doubt that the sound moral judgement is a key to effective leadership. However, some masses believe that good leader's should focus more on maintaining the respect of their peers rather than giving good judgement. I strongly disagree with this viewpoint as the good leadership is based on sound and ethical judgement and a leader is always there for maintaining the respect of the society members rather than his or her peers only. Therefore, leaders should focus on the betterment and giving good judgement.
One reason for my belief is that companions of most of the leaders are selfish and self-centred and support the person to accomplish their motives. Moreover, some of them are corrupt and may suggest the honoured person to do something wrong and in order to maintain the integrity and fulfil the wishes of his or her peers leader me indulge in doing bad for the society. This as a result will disrespect their position and even results in the loss of leadership. To exemplify, according to a survey by a university among 60% of the corruption cases among leaders, there is a involvement of their team members and their decision making. Thus, leaders should undergo moral judgement in place of pleasing their peers.
Although it is true that a leader can work better with the help of its team members and can achieve the goals with their support and to achieve this they should have to take great care of their members and have good relationship with them, but if a better leader should have the capability to take a fair and a moral decision on its own, which can create peace and harmony in the society and helps in creating good relation with the members of the society. Furthermore, a good decision which can further result in progress of society can help in securing the position of the leader and also help in achieving respect from peers.
Perhaps, the overriding reason for my belief is that a leader have its own moral values and ethics and which helping the leader to take that position. There may be some views and thoughts which a leader keep in mind before taking that position and if during his or her period a leader keep on listening to the views of their peers then they may not be able to do what they want to do and for what they come on this position. For instance, CM of Punjab Working under the authority of CM of Delhi and usually follow the decisions made by him and this leads to loss in the respect among members of the society because they expect something else from their leader.
For all these reasons, I believe that leaders should have to give a sound moral judgement without the influence of their peers and make their society peaceful and progressive.
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 50
- The following appeared in a letter sent by a committee of homeowners from the Deerhaven Acres to all homeowners in Deerhaven Acres Seven years ago homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictions on how the community s yards should 75
- We learn through direct experience to accept a theory without experiencing it is to learn nothing at all 66
- The following was posted on an Internet real estate discussion site Of the two leading real estate firms in our town Adams Realty and Fitch Realty Adams is clearly superior Adams has 40 real estate agents In contrast Fitch has 25 many of whom work only pa 73
- We learn through direct experience to accept a theory without experiencing it is to learn nothing at all 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 573, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...orruption cases among leaders, there is a involvement of their team members and t...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, no doubt, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2232.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 478.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66945606695 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43533694923 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.416317991632 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 676.8 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.2726542181 60.3974514979 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.8 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8666666667 23.4991977007 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.21951772744 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0674766529701 0.243740707755 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0256450769608 0.0831039109588 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275947523692 0.0758088955206 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0410110920218 0.150359130593 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229661552261 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.