Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems.
Human beings are the only life forms on Earth which are regarded as intelligent species. With the help of advancements in science and technology, these species have able to achieve the unachievable in a very short duration. The speed at which science and technology have been expanding is breathtaking and so some believe that in future they might be able to solve all the problems. But this belief would prove to be wrong for other problems which could not be solved by science and technology alone. Since past and present can very well be used to predict the future, one could also find the unsolvable problems in the future by comparing the past and the present.
The problems that we as human beings faced in the past and the present were and are nearly uncountable. Though we were successful in solving some of them with science and technology most of them still remain mysterious. Whenever we solve a fraction of problems, new issues come up. The best examples would be the advent of nucleur power plants which were constructed to get clean and green nucleur power and thus decrease the dependence on convential power which are a major cause of pollution. By solving one problem we aquainted the other in the form of radioactive nucleur waste-the disposal of which is still a issue which indeed has made the problem more complex.
It is quite obvious that it is nearly impossible to achieve the maximum limits of science and technology as they are limitless and always have a room for improvement which depends upon the new problem that one faces. So, one can argue that a society will always be advancing from one set of problems to another with time. Another issue that could be unsolvable by science and technology for a long time is the human nature itself. Eventhough we have various studies on human nature and behaviour everyday but it would be highly improbable for technology to completely cure and/or modulate human emotions like depression, anger, jealosy, etc . Humans are social animals and the feeling of loneliness cannot never be replaced by machines or softwares. These view points can only be challenged if science and technology could reach its' maximum ideal advancement level and are also able to decode many aspects of life.
Conclusively, one could believe in the powers of science and technology but one should not rely on them completely to solve all the problems which cannot be done without the involvement of humans and their intelligence and emotions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 33 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | qwertyy | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-28 | David Okenwa | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | najaf | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | hello_kratnesh101 | 33 | view |
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 30
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 50
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of sidewalk rage similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The resul 69
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 613, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ur waste-the disposal of which is still a issue which indeed has made the problem...
^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...s studies on human nature and behaviour everyday but it would be highly improbable for t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 640, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ons like depression, anger, jealosy, etc . Humans are social animals and the feeli...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2066.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 422.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89573459716 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61557830723 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488151658768 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4528540641 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.529411765 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8235294118 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11764705882 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421147636785 0.243740707755 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139990806097 0.0831039109588 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087625702098 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280487658774 0.150359130593 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629251122869 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.