I completely disagree with the statement. It is known that science and technology does make our lives easier, we have come from hunting for food to trading millions of dollars worth of goods sitting at our desks. However as we solve one problem we create another one.
Consider cars for example. It was difficult to travel long distances in the absence of powered vehicles. We solved this problem using steam engines to move a motorised vehicle. However in solving this problem we created another - accidents. Road accidents were non existent before the invention of cars, today millions of people are killed in road accidents around the world.
Another example can be the invention of Facebook. It sure has changed the way we humans interact with out friends and maintain our relationships however it has introduced its own problem of data privacy issues and screen addiction. The same can be said about most of the technology in use today.
The given statement that technology can solve all of society's problems contradicts itself. Assume that we do invent some technology that can solve all our problems, the technology itself will become our problem. Humans strive for happiness and a lot of us achieve this happiness in meaningful work. If all our problems are solved for us we will have no meaningful work left for us to do hence creating a problem.
I believe science and technology helps us to grow and this growth will never stop. Taking an example of the movie Terminator, even if we invent an artificial machine intended to solve all our socital problems there is a possibility that we might need to fight the same robots to preserve our society.
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be 75
- Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of 039 sidewalk rage 039 similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The result is an increase in assaults property damage 67
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...rs worth of goods sitting at our desks. However as we solve one problem we create anoth...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...am engines to move a motorised vehicle. However in solving this problem we created anot...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
... has changed the way we humans interact with out friends and maintain our relationships ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 282.0 442.535393258 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91843971631 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59188664153 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.4744536364 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5882352941 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.05882352941 5.21951772744 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30397486494 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100484711007 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935915497546 0.0758088955206 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161771058089 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707667764005 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.