Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems.
While it is true that scientific advancements have been effective in solving most of the problems of the previous generations, it has also created new ones in the current society, to state that all issues can be solved is erring.
There is always a limitation to science and technology. For instance, the deep learning model is famous that computers can compute the relations of factors. However, without enough learning data, it is still not able to make predictions. Human control of the learning process, such as preventing overfitting is also needed or it could not be a useful model. Because of the limitation, human intervention is always required.
Even though technology and science progress quickly, today's limitations might be broken tomorrow, new problems follow. To illustrate, Industry Revolution has improved production effectiveness, and physical tasks are removed a lot from our daily life. One cannot deny that factories have produced pollution, which brought irreversible damage to our environment. Since we all live on the same planet, pollution turns out to affect people's health and lead to chronic illness and deaths.
Moreover, smartphone pervasiveness has turned humans into superficial thinkers. A study found that the average person picked his or her smartphone about 100 times a day. Gaining new information can trigger the release of chemicals in our brains like dopamine, which associate with happiness. Consequently, people are getting used to short-term stimulation and be satisfied with it, without thinking deeply and personally. As a result, it became more and more difficult for people to be satisfied and stay focus. Subsequently, people who have mental illness have also increased recently.
Science and technology have made the impossible possible; they also have given rise to multiple problems. So it would be too optimistic to assume that one day they will eradicate all the world's problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 33 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | qwertyy | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-28 | David Okenwa | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | najaf | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | hello_kratnesh101 | 33 | view |
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 58
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College To serve the housing needs of our students Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories Buckingham s enrollment is growing and based on current tren 27
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily Use specific reasons and ex 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration Give specific examples and details to support your answer 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, still, while, for instance, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 303.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41914191419 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94186613372 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.650165016502 0.4932671777 132% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.887592012 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2222222222 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8333333333 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272425428511 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633459183007 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756671516286 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142701133539 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756288781529 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.38706741573 119% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.