Scientific theories, which most people consider as 'fact,' almost invariable prove to be inaccurate. Thus, one should look upon any information described as 'factual' with skepticism since it may well be proven false in the future.
The ideas of the society has always found a place in the science. Since scientists can not absorb themselves from the society, science always had glimpses of the periods knowledge. Thus, it is possible that scientific theories which are expected to be accurate may be proven wrong or inaccurate in the following times. That’s a good reason to believe that there are no facts in science which can not be questioned.
First and foremost, science is limited to its periods technology. Therefore in the experiments it is easy to mis a crucial part and derive wrong conclusions. For example, atom was believed to be consisted of one particle which was the essence of the material in the ancient times. Nevertheless, after nearly thousand years later, thanks to Dalton and Rutherford, current atom model theory is created which disproves the preceding theory. This was due to creation of new technology that enabled Dalton and also Rutherford to make more accurate observations and led them see the small radiational variations in their experiments.
Besides the technology and opportunities, science is also effected by the knowledge itself. It consists of cumulative knowledge. This makes it dependent to its history. Therefore, some facts or axioms may be accurate for a specific time and can be consistent at some point with the observable facts. Consider, Euclidean geometry which is the most basic and used geometry. It is still used in ordinary life which is based on 5 axioms. However, Riemann proved there might be other geometries which are more accurate and can be used to prove one of Euclid’s axioms. In that case assumed facts of one theory became a corollary of the new theory. Euclid couldn’t discover Riemanian geometry, and had to assume some axioms because: new branches and tools of mathematics had to be invented. In Euclid’s era, analysis and geometry was not as developed as it was in Riemann.
To sum, science is cumulative and it always questions not only the unknown but also the known theories. Depending on the technology and scientific knowledge of its era, scientific theories excepted as facts are likely to be inaccurate. Therefore, one should always be skeptic about the facts in science and ready to question them if necessary.
- We must reduce overhead here at the cafe. Instead of openning at 6 a.m. weekdays, we will now open at 8 a.m. On weekends, we will only open from 9 a.m. untill 4 p.m. The decrease in hours of operations will help save money because we won't be paying for u 50
- Scientific theories, which most people consider as 'fact,' almost invariable prove to be inaccurate. Thus, one should look upon any information described as 'factual' with skepticism since it may well be proven false in the future. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'had' and 'glimpses'.
Suggestion: had always glimpses
...rb themselves from the society, science always had glimpses of the periods knowledge. Thus, it is p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'periods'' or 'period's'?
Suggestion: periods'; period's
...ety, science always had glimpses of the periods knowledge. Thus, it is possible that sc...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e is limited to its periods technology. Therefore in the experiments it is easy to mis a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...cient times. Nevertheless, after nearly thousand years later, thanks to Dalton and Ruthe...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'thus', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.226635514019 0.240241500013 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.163551401869 0.157235817809 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0957943925234 0.0880659088768 109% => OK
Adverbs: 0.053738317757 0.0497285424764 108% => OK
Pronouns: 0.035046728972 0.0444667217837 79% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0934579439252 0.12292977631 76% => OK
Participles: 0.0420560747664 0.0406280797675 104% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.90405827611 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.035046728972 0.030933414821 113% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0794392523364 0.0997080785238 80% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.018691588785 0.0249443105267 75% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.018691588785 0.0148568991511 126% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2287.0 2732.02544248 84% => OK
No of words: 373.0 452.878318584 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.13136729223 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.380697050938 0.366273622748 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.310991957105 0.280924506359 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.238605898123 0.200843997647 119% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.152815013405 0.132149295362 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90405827611 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 219.290929204 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520107238606 0.48968727796 106% => OK
Word variations: 56.5484150338 55.4138127331 102% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.9545454545 23.380412469 73% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.889056184 59.4972553346 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.954545455 141.124799967 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9545454545 23.380412469 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.590909090909 0.674092028746 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 48.053741165 51.4728631049 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.43518518519 1.64882698954 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277228653523 0.391690518653 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.112323224541 0.123202303941 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0678749390545 0.077325440228 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.461313198455 0.547984918172 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.130450548933 0.149214159877 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994379782831 0.161403998019 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631895624593 0.0892212321368 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.398164319695 0.385218514788 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0431698064218 0.0692045440612 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197607558019 0.275328986314 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531316856145 0.0653680567796 81% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.4325221239 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88274336283 287% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 12.0 2.70907079646 443% => Less neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.