Scientist and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Scientists and other researchers concentrate on the most people’s demand or interest. When the statement discuss about how many people will have benefit by technological development such as medical treatment, fourth industrialization, it will definitely helpful for the people who have cruel disease. Natural disaster such as earthquake or tsunami is detrimental effect that gives degenerate people’s living. In order to help those kinds of people, scientists should focus on their research of people’s demand. Further scientists and other researchers are people who live whole life with various types of scientific field; for example, there are ecology, biology, chemistry, physiology and so on. If they need to live their life, there should lucrative work; there should be enough investment that most people need. Moreover, when scientists work more on people’s demand, human’s life will have comfortable situation.
First and foremost, scientists are human being, they live with their science. In order to live and bear with their science, then they should work on the lucrative work. Reality does not pay scientist bill even if they work only their interest. Technological development focusing on people’s demand can pursue scientists to make more valuable profits than their interests. For example, engineering job is trying to make car more valuable by maximizing usage of gasoline. This will help to reduce cost of gasoline for people who use this car.
Furthermore, scientists can make human society more comfortable. The reason to be interrelated with this statement is because when people want to change facing any situation, this means people are unwilling to deal with the situation. For example, people could not achieve any information from dangerous situation where it has abundant of radioactive; people can’t go because of hazardous situation. However, physical scientists are trying to make robot to explore those places to glean information.
In conclusion, scientists should concentrate what people want in order to have remunerative work, and make human society more comfortable.
- Some believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time and financial well-being. Others believe that society need no make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jo 70
- Progress should be the aim of any great society. People too often cling unnecessarily to obsolete ways of thinking and acting because of both a high comfort level and a fear of the unknown.Write a response in which you examine your own position on the sta 58
- Benton City residents have adopted healthier lifestyles. A recent survey of city residents shows that the eating habits of city residents conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they did ten years ago. During those ten years, l 66
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, a chain of movie-rental stores."Because of declining profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore's ten movie-rental stores. Raising prices is not a good option, since 66
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 944, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s life will have comfortable situation. First and foremost, scientists are human...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: REASON_IS_BECAUSE[1]
Message: Probably an incorrect phrase. Use 'the reason 'is that''.
Suggestion: is that
... to be interrelated with this statement is because when people want to change facing any s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 321.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68847352025 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05276240701 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538940809969 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4557997551 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.444444444 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129000402886 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549425926096 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519923679718 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792502813065 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407529696753 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.1639044944 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.