In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement claims that discussion should be required during progress when there are people who have contrasting points of view. In company, there are discrete reasons to make discussion in progress; when people have different reasons that one policy should be changed, then people should discuss on that particular issue. On the other hand, progress doesn’t require discussion even when there are people who have compromising points of view. However, we as human being, do not have perfect ideas on every progress, there should be refutation. Further, in order to make less possibility to have wrong decision in progress, and to learn, and understand each other’s contrasting point of view, the progress will have better compact and strength with embracing most ideas. Therefore, we should fathom about the discussion during progress.
First and foremost, progress addresses about how long it will be beneficial for future decision when we have discussion. Take for instance, when people manufacture alternative energy changing from the gasoline, there are so many reasons that alternative energy is unsuccessful idea of all time. However, when company considers on long-term relation between consumers and usage of gasoline, will decrease next forty years later, which means this company anticipates long term stance on the world change.
Secondly, discussion will make less mistakes in the vision of the work, when there is any problematic circumstance. Consider there are many urgent moments in society; such as economic crisis, national defense is part of urgent moments. When those happened in society, people in government do not really command as specific way, but they first discuss the first piece of why that cause affects our nation, talks about solution, and takes an action on that circumstance. During discussion, they lessen the mistakes so that they could help with such problematic situation.
Lastly, we are acknowledged and admitted by discussion during progress. Recent article showed that subordinates in company did not make any type of compromising ideas onto their superior because they know that they would get derided. However, if people understand and admit the compromising ideas on the one specific idea, then this idea will be helpful to understand the stance each other without discriminating others. So for the idea of having equable mind on contrasting idea will give people equality of giving ideas.
In closing, as explained above, in order to have long-term beneficial point, give less possibility of mistakes, and have equality of giving ideas, progress requires discussion.
- "Despite its downtown location, the Rialto Movie Theater, a local institution for five decades, must make big changes or close its doors forever. It should follow the example of the new Apex Theater in the mall outside of town. When the Apex opened last y 58
- Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.Reason: people who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes. 66
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people’s efficiency so that they have more leisure time. 50
- Benton City residents have adopted healthier lifestyles. A recent survey of city residents shows that the eating habits of city residents conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they did ten years ago. During those ten years, l 66
- College and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 540, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...deas on every progress, there should be refutation. Further, in order to make less possibi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun mistakes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...nge. Secondly, discussion will make less mistakes in the vision of the work, whe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, really, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2232.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48402948403 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75728883696 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506142506143 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Interrogative: 5.0 0.740449438202 675% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1942215453 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6111111111 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241468744378 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893320801132 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740748186415 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122716000921 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752565389668 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.