Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position
How can we decide which area scientists and other researchers should focus? Before answering to this question, it should be noted that this is not just a matter of which area scientists and researchers focus, but more about which area should be prioritized when using the financial and time resources human beings have. Thus, I believe that there should be more than just one standard, the greatest number of beneficiaries, for the following reasons.
Firstly, it should be considered which area is experiencing most pressing social, medical, and economical issues. If we overlook urgent issues that require rapid actions, but instead focus our resources on solving less pressing issues, it would not be wise. Consider the fact that mass killing, including suicidal terror, has been a global issue since the establishment of ISIS. The fear of terror has been prevalent all over the world and countries try to protect their citizens from terrorists. Such given situation, it would not be plausible if one argues that scientists and researchers should focus on newly spreading influenza, which causes mild fever, simply because the influenza virus would affect the higher number of people, regardless of the urgency of the issue. Thus, simply considering the number of people affected is not a good way of making a decision.
Secondly, it is also important to consider the long-term benefit of the field progress rather than simply the number of beneficiaries. Some issues of a field require further study to be utilized as a fundamental knowledge of the long-term development of the field. Such work, though may not benefit many people immediately, but critical in the future study. Consider, for example, contriving indispensible components of spacecraft. This does not seem to benefit so many people’s lives at this moment. However, it is vital for the progress of space travel in the future. Therefore, it is important to consider not only how many people research can benefit, but also how critical a study is in a field of endeavor.
Of course, some may still argue that the more people research can serve, the better, and thus the number of people research can help should be prioritized. However, this approach may not be so cost effective in some cases. Consider, for example, if we have to choose between two studies, one is far from completion but will benefit a great number of people, and the other, which is about to be completed with a bit of further support. Although the former one would affect more number of people, it would be more cost effective to focus on the latter, whose completion is so close, rather than investing on the former project, which no one can guarantee to be accomplished.
To sum, while there can be benefits in scientists and other researchers focusing on projects that can contribute to a number of people, such standard cannot and should not be the only one. It is important to consider other conditions when we utilize our financial and time resources as well as scientists and researchers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-30 | Mukul | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | Nikita Goel | 66 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | SOUMEDHIK | 83 | view |
| 2019-06-02 | dsbp15 | 66 | view |
| 2019-05-26 | fa1salahm3d | 58 | view |
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. Write a response in which you 59
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 57
- According to a recent report, cheating among college and university students is on the rise. However, Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic en 67
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants.Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only about 2 percent of customers have complai 66
- People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as a whole.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position y 67
Comments
Essay evaluation report
arguments: OK
-------------
flaws:
1. The conclusion of an argument is duplicated to the introduction of that paragraph. Like:
Therefore, it is important to consider not only how many people research can benefit, but also how critical a study is in a field of endeavor.
'However, it is vital for the progress of space travel in the future.' is enough for the conclusion of the paragraph.
2. the conclusion in the third paragraph '...but also how critical a study is in a field of endeavor. ' is not for the third paragraph, but for the second paragraph.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 505 350
No. of Characters: 2463 1500
No. of Different Words: 223 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.74 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.877 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.64 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 183 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 122 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 93 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 60 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.955 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.28 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.818 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.312 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.523 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.131 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...cing most pressing social, medical, and economical issues. If we overlook urgent issues th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 466, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... support. Although the former one would affect more number of people, it would be more cost...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'of course', 'as well as', 'in some cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.208041958042 0.240241500013 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.152097902098 0.157235817809 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0979020979021 0.0880659088768 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0681818181818 0.0497285424764 137% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0297202797203 0.0444667217837 67% => OK
Prepositions: 0.111888111888 0.12292977631 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0402097902098 0.0406280797675 99% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.76790319719 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0227272727273 0.030933414821 73% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0856643356643 0.0997080785238 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0437062937063 0.0249443105267 175% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0244755244755 0.0148568991511 165% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3050.0 2732.02544248 112% => OK
No of words: 505.0 452.878318584 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0396039604 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.382178217822 0.366273622748 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.267326732673 0.280924506359 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.209900990099 0.200843997647 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.134653465347 0.132149295362 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76790319719 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 219.290929204 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461386138614 0.48968727796 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 53.1409038123 55.4138127331 96% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.9545454545 23.380412469 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0404154894 59.4972553346 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.636363636 141.124799967 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9545454545 23.380412469 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.909090909091 0.674092028746 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 49.6872187219 51.4728631049 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.44055944056 1.64882698954 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429648181214 0.391690518653 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.145218216125 0.123202303941 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.105981014167 0.077325440228 137% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.523626648264 0.547984918172 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.165769732695 0.149214159877 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16670222223 0.161403998019 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833664370376 0.0892212321368 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.39705603513 0.385218514788 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0381828943243 0.0692045440612 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306752277413 0.275328986314 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327591016957 0.0653680567796 50% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.66592920354 191% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.