Scientists and other Researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
I agree with above assertion that scientists and researchers should research more in the field which benefits the public. Researchers should prioritize their research based on the needs of public and society. My opinions lie in agreement with the assertion because of the parameters.
Firstly, the world as it is right now is facing various problems such as climate change, global warming and many more. Researchers ought to focus more on such issues instead of other researches as they are more important and pose a threat against the world. Problems such as Global warming threaten lives on earth and should be prioritized by researchers as an area to focus their research on instead.
Secondly, there are limited resources present on the earth and their dissolution rate is increasing daily. Hence it would be sensible to use for the scientists to use these resources judiciously and in the needs of public.
Also, as war can break out suddenly in different countries, it is important for various scientific organizations to focus their research more on equipment that are helpful in both defense and attack.
Thirdly, all these scientific organizations are funded by the various governments of different countries and there are many other problems that the world is facing, like poverty, illiteracy and many more. And as the government is funding these organizations, it is the role of the researchers to work in areas that avail the greatest number of people.
Though there is a negative aspect to this assertion, which is that in an ideal society, researchers must be focus on areas in which they are more interested in and in which they are dexterous as they would be able to make extensive use of their knowledge and skills. Also it is not ethically correct to cajole someone to do a particular research. It is one’s own right to choose whatever field or work they want to do.
In the end, I conclude that even though it is not ethical to coerce researchers to work in a particular field, looking at the circumstances that the world is in right now, scientists still should research in the areas which are for the betterment of the public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | shoeb_athar | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | DH123 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Jianmo | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | Mukul | 50 | view |
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times. 50
- A recently issued twenty year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates. Salicylates are the members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat heada 49
- Scientists and other Researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people. 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...r dissolution rate is increasing daily. Hence it would be sensible to use for the sci...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t avail the greatest number of people. Though there is a negative aspect to thi...
^^^
Line 10, column 268, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...sive use of their knowledge and skills. Also it is not ethically correct to cajole s...
^^^^
Line 10, column 325, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'particular research'.
Suggestion: particular research
...hically correct to cajole someone to do a particular research. It is one's own right to choose w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hatever field or work they want to do. In the end, I conclude that even though ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 364.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96978021978 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80366665877 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456043956044 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9861915154 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.6 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2666666667 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427245680288 0.243740707755 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142313909797 0.0831039109588 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118256129662 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187044032241 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837153185104 0.0667264976115 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.