Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
During history, humans have owed their progress in various aspects of life, from experiencing convenience in everyday life to advanced medical, communicational and traveling methods, to academic researches and studies. Many scientists devote most part of their lives to research to improve humans' life conditions. Some people, however, may question which areas these studies should focus on. As far as I am concerned, researches that are more related to ordinary people's life should give more credence, and in the following, I will explain my points of view in detail.
The first important reason to hold this idea is that it is morally incumbent on scientists to concentrate on issues and problems which harass more humans in the world. Generally, scientists are considered as elites in societies. They usually possess peculiar talents and professional skills which are very advantageous when the community encounters a serious problem or issue. Their abilities and qualifications enable them to address and resolve problems which many people are not able because they lack enough necessary knowledge and profession. For instance, medical researchers can play an important role in inventing more accurate devices and methods to diagnose various diseases more reliably, developing more effective and less invasive treatments, and more advance preventive methods, such as new vaccines, and determining impaired genes which can result in specific disabilities. Thus, scientists have an important responsibility in relation to their societies and people.
Moreover, scientific researches that bring about the limited application for people and societies as a whole are usually considered as a waste of time, money and resources. Generally, academic studies require advanced technologies, expensive equipment, and huge financial resources to be done as they are planned. In addition, it takes usually long times, even some years, for a study to be reached to the desired results. Considering such high demands, the governments and research organizations are often reluctant to invest their resources in fields of studies that do not bring about feasible advantages. Thus, it is not actually cost-effective and logical to allocate valuable society's resources to endeavors which may not produce considerable benefits for almost all people in the community.
Even though I believe that the researchers should devote their attention to investigate issues that are beneficial for the greatest number of people, it does not necessarily mean that studies that are not related to ordinary life conditions should be dismissed. These kinds of studies can be also useful because they not only contribute to the improvement of other fields of knowledge but also gratify humans' ambitions. Consider outer exploration endeavors for instance. Such studies provide scientists with more information about the composition of the other planets' atmosphere and their mass; hence, expand our knowledge in other areas, particularly chemistry, physics and mathematics. Furthermore, such studies can satisfy the desires of passionate researchers who tend to know whether the human can live out of our planet or even the solar system someday.
In conclusion, although doing research in less conventional areas contributes to the expansion of the science, I believe that most academic research should be carried out to enhance human beings' life because it is morally important and hinder wasting nations' wealth and resources which can be applied in other more vital areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | Sagar1234567890 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | TiOluwani97 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-01 | wikoxa7293@ekcsoft.com | 50 | view |
| 2023-01-03 | abhikhanna | 62 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 82
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 66
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another Write a resp 83
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 83
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 561, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'planets'' or 'planet's'?
Suggestion: planets'; planet's
...tion about the composition of the other planets atmosphere and their mass; hence, expan...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 189, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
... should be carried out to enhance human beings life because it is morally important an...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, even so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3017.0 2235.4752809 135% => OK
No of words: 538.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60780669145 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9643250648 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531598513011 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 953.1 704.065955056 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.3282160684 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.666666667 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.619047619 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226869677243 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679424341205 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424644973729 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132093799882 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306973967314 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 14.1392134831 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 48.8420337079 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.38706741573 119% => OK
difficult_words: 174.0 100.480337079 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.