Skill alone, no matter how great, does not guarantee a masterpiece.
Have you ever wondered why even though Bill and Clinton are the ones you could approach for a mechanic job, you will always prefer one to the other? Maybe you may have thought about approaching Clinton but you find out he actually does not have a university degree, But Bill on the other hand is both a mechanic and a university graduate in Mechanical engineering and have done a bit of university research in the field and has made a name for himself. I guess it’s safe to say that more people will be seen navigating toward Bill while making the effort to consciously avoid Clinton for the sake of errors. The prompt recommends that even the greatest skill cannot guarantee a masterpiece. Well in my view, I strongly agree with this stance and argue that there is a lot more one has to do, order than merely having the skills to be able to master a thing for the following reasons.
A person’s character says all about person, a certain type of character frequently updated to what is most needed is a very necessary key for success. Many times people would tell you all you have to do is the master the skill, I agree with that, but you also need to master a good character in order to be able to properly deliver the skill. Take for example Cristiano Ronaldo, He one of the most skillful football players to ever grace the 21st century, however possessing this great skills is not the only cause of his success. Cristiano is a disciplinarian that has always kept to time while training, always the first to take a lead role for the team, and fires other players to do the same. I can correctly tell you that the disciplined character is one of the reasons many football clubs want him and the reason for his success. From the life of Cristiano I can say that good character in addition to being highly skillful is necessary for success.
Furthermore, it usually said that the ring of connections that a person keeps is likely going to be a limiting factor on them. A person can possess the skills requires to be successful, however is not properly connected and managed and might end up not being successful. Nigeria as a country has suffered from this. From the early 1900s up until now, Nigeria as a country has lost a lot of skillful individuals because these individuals in those time did not have a plethora of necessary managements and connections in order to be successful. The scenarios is a living case. It explains that one can be very skillful but become less successful than a non-skilled person in a particular field only because he is not connected to or managed by the right persons or set of person. In cases like this, we can see that being highly skillful is not enough.
People say that once you have the skills, it’s in you forever and you can never lose the skills and definitely on day it is going to pan out properly for you. This may sound as somewhat true and correct but it has been confirmed that many skillful people live in abject poverty, regardless of what skill area they are in. It brings me to the conclusion that have the Skill is a great start, but most of the times, it is not enough.
- Skill alone no matter how great does not guarantee a masterpiece 66
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field 66
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens 66
- Skill alone no matter how great does not guarantee a masterpiece 66
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reaso 62
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...n order to be successful. The scenarios is a living case. It explains that one can...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, while, as to, for example, i guess, in addition, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2568.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 571.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49737302977 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88831323574 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51179995913 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45534150613 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 804.6 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4144416667 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.285714286 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1904761905 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106209021381 0.243740707755 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395254727337 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414734854379 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.072118297721 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207688675093 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 48.8420337079 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...n order to be successful. The scenarios is a living case. It explains that one can...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, while, as to, for example, i guess, in addition, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2568.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 571.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49737302977 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88831323574 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51179995913 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45534150613 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 804.6 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4144416667 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.285714286 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1904761905 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106209021381 0.243740707755 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395254727337 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414734854379 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.072118297721 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207688675093 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 48.8420337079 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.