"College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field"
The rate of unemployment all over the world is increasing, leading to a large population of unemployed people. The number of students that graduate every year adds to the pool of unemployed people as the competition for jobs is high, leaving most of them without jobs. The prompt argues that students should select a course of study based on the availability of jobs that require the expertise from that course of study. I mostly agree with this for the two reasons outlined below. However, I do concede that, allowing passion to drive the choice of a field of study allows people to live happily and fulfilled with themselves.
To begin, students should choose a course of study based on the availability of jobs, because college tuition is expensive, and a lot of money is spent for four to five years of college education. For example, the cost of college in the United States is about a hundred thousand dollars, and going to college to study a course that its application in the real world has waned or even obsolete is considered wasteful. Additionally, students and their guardians often pay through the nose and run into debts in student loans just to get the college tuition paid, and such debts should not be incurred on a course that will not guarantee a job upon graduation. These debts take years to pay, and students need jobs to raise money to clear the loans accrued for their education. In a nutshell, it is pertinent to carefully consider the availability of jobs in a particular field before proceeding to take the pains of paying to be trained in such a field.
Secondly, students should properly consider their chances of getting a job before selecting a field of study, because they should consider the unavailability of jobs and seek to go for courses that will make them job providers and not seekers. For instance, a career in the tech industry has proven to be lucrative over the years. For example, Mark Zuckerberg, through a career in the tech space, has not only made something good for himself but has also provided jobs for millions of people. Also, Elon Musk has been able to escape the unemployed tag through his career in tech. Students should consider the fact that if they pursue a career in a field with low availability of jobs, they will not be making a difference but joining the other unemployed people. One of the purposes of education should be to alleviate people from suffering and not to aggravate it, and hence students should strive to assuage their unavailability of jobs by considering it when applying to colleges.
Admittedly, passion should drive people to pursue a career, as following one’s passion in a particular field of study regardless of whether there are jobs or not contributes greatly to fulfilment in life. For instance, doing something that one really loves can help to make a person feel satisfied with life and have a sense of contentment. For example, scientists that pursue a “not-so-lucrative" career in academia and research relative to some other more lucrative careers in business, technological industry and the likes are also contributing immensely to the world doing what they love to do.
In conclusion, students should consider the availability of jobs in making a choice of a field of study but should also try to strike a balance as they do not want to have a job, they are not happy with.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-23 | Nanggyu Park | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Jhon Kwame | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | wopona8219 | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-05 | sahil nain | 62 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | Winner | 66 | view |
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field 66
- Skill alone no matter how great does not guarantee a masterpiece 66
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reaso 62
- Skill alone no matter how great does not guarantee a masterpiece 66
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...igh, leaving most of them without jobs. The prompt argues that students should sele...
^^^
Line 1, column 630, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... happily and fulfilled with themselves. To begin, students should choose a cours...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 953, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f paying to be trained in such a field. Secondly, students should properly consi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 380, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
.... For example, scientists that pursue a “not-so-lucrative' career in academi...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 101.0 58.6224719101 172% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2811.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 581.0 442.535393258 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83820998279 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90957651803 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83425500665 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450946643718 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 882.0 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.8118267037 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.55 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.05 23.4991977007 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422123575742 0.243740707755 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127816064175 0.0831039109588 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111489171162 0.0758088955206 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262378071607 0.150359130593 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107466327203 0.0667264976115 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.