Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take.

Essay topics:

Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.

Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

Submitted by hpamnani on Mon, 08/29/2016 - 04:32

Nature is the best gift god has given to us. There are countless of specied all around the world. Many species have already become extinct becuase of Human activities and natural activities. Here, the policy suggested is that endangered species should be saved only if human activities are the reason behind it. However, society should also make efforts in order to save endangered species which are becoming extinct other than human activities also.

Air pollution, water pollution, soil pollution are being spreaded widely in today's era. Due to this reason, many species have become endangered and might become extinct in near future. So society should take care of these endangered species, so that they do not become extinct.

If some species become extinct, ecological balance of earth may be disturbed. So, in this case even if the species are not becoming extinct because of human activities, society should take some preventive actions in order to save these species. So that, the ecological balance between species is maintained.

Another reason which can be considered here is that, today's situation ma be result of previous human activities. For example, earth temprature has increased becuase of human activities. So, in future people might think that increaing temprature is not the result of human activities. So, according to the policy they might not save endangered species. Which might be dangerous for the nature.

However, endangered species should be save only if the cost to save them is bearable by the society. If some species are becoming extinct, but cost to save them may not be affordable to the society.

Also, some species have already become extinct, and do not have any significant impact on ecological cycle. Take for example, dinosaurs, they became extinct millions of year ago, but they do not have any significant impact on today's ecological cycle. So, if the endangered species do not have significant impact on the ecological cycle, society might avoid to save the species.

All in all, endangered species should also be saved in case they are becoming extinct by natural activities. Also, the cost of saving the potential entinction should also be taken into consideration for the policy.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-21 Himanshu Sharma 66 view
2019-12-11 Manoj Gyawali 50 view
2019-12-11 Manoj Gyawali 50 view
2019-12-09 harshit kukreja 54 view
2019-12-07 Caveira meyona 62 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
GMAT/GRE Issue Task
Essays by user hpamnani :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 446, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ing extinct other than human activities also. Air pollution, water pollution, soi...
^^^^
Line 9, column 39, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'saved'?
Suggestion: saved
... However, endangered species should be save only if the cost to save them is bearab...
^^^^
Line 11, column 352, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid saving'.
Suggestion: avoid saving
... on the ecological cycle, society might avoid to save the species. All in all, endangered ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'for example']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.220048899756 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.19315403423 0.157235817809 123% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0977995110024 0.0880659088768 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0733496332518 0.0497285424764 148% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0220048899756 0.0444667217837 49% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114914425428 0.12292977631 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0660146699267 0.0406280797675 162% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.60582823186 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0220048899756 0.030933414821 71% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.078239608802 0.0997080785238 78% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0366748166259 0.0249443105267 147% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00733496332518 0.0148568991511 49% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2239.0 2732.02544248 82% => OK
No of words: 361.0 452.878318584 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.20221606648 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.58838876751 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.401662049861 0.366273622748 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.299168975069 0.280924506359 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.18836565097 0.200843997647 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.127423822715 0.132149295362 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60582823186 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 219.290929204 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.404432132964 0.48968727796 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 41.1820118769 55.4138127331 74% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.6956521739 23.380412469 67% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7128908362 59.4972553346 52% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.347826087 141.124799967 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6956521739 23.380412469 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.304347826087 0.674092028746 45% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.94800884956 141% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 45.6125496808 51.4728631049 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.38983050847 1.64882698954 84% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465796041926 0.391690518653 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.165787626223 0.123202303941 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.119287489117 0.077325440228 154% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.572744219365 0.547984918172 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.14962339351 0.149214159877 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182829743606 0.161403998019 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966774529544 0.0892212321368 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.241219122666 0.385218514788 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0537419001252 0.0692045440612 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287495654546 0.275328986314 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838186588265 0.0653680567796 128% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.70907079646 221% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.5995575221 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.