Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take.

Essay topics:

Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

We often see some protests advocating rare creatures should be saved, but how can we save all endangered species under the definite budget? It’s likely that human activities cover the whole ecosystem, and it’s difficult to distinguish which activity is belong to human. In my opinion, society should have a priority, meaning that it makes efforts to save endangered species only if the extinction is the result of human activities.

As we known, saving a certain creature consists of many processes. Firstly, the authorities has to hire the experts, and analyze what the coverage of the animal trace is. Secondly, the group made up of the professions needs to initiate the plan to efficiently conserve the environment to ensure the safety of this creature. Finally, before implementing the plan, it also has to hire many people to protect and monitor the saving progress. Above is just the plan for a kind of animal, then there are thousands of animals waiting for us to pay attention to them. Through these steps, the government has to appropriate the large amount of money to promote and implement the plan, but it still has many aspects to cost, such as pension, public transportation, and so on. Hence, it seems impossible to save all the endangered creatures, however, we can go all out to save as many species as we could.

It’s likely that human activities contain lots of fields with the technology improves rapidly, so it’s not exaggerate to say that nearly every activity we can come up with is all related to human being. Consequently, how can we rule out a factor that is totally uncorrelated with human activity? Take polar bears for example, they have been regarded as endangered species for a long time. Owing to the melting ice, they gradually lose habitat, and have to swim longer and longer from one place to another place. The velocity of melt is rising for factories emit a large amount of carbon dioxide and the average temperature is never stop declining. Even though nobody intends to hunt them for high-valued goods, when we turn on the air conditioners in the scorching hot summer, we’re the killer to make bears have no places to inhabit.

Some may argue that, if we don’t save all the species, it’s likely that we may lose some opportunities to extract genes of certain animal or plants. Nevertheless, we have the latest technology and there are various incentives for researchers to develop a new way to cure cancers. Once someone have successfully discovered the blood of the animal is the cure to the cancer, he can live his rest life without any financial burden. What’s more, his name will be recorded on the history forever, and the feat will always be commemorated by all the people.

To sum up, saving all the species is important, but under the constraint of budget and reality, I agree people should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-12-06 daniel1984 16 view
2021-07-29 loveabby625 66 view
2018-12-06 daniel1984 66 view
2018-12-06 daniel1984 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user brownie :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...ficult to distinguish which activity is belong to human. In my opinion, society should...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'knew'?
Suggestion: knew
...he result of human activities. As we known, saving a certain creature consists of ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 643, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'stopped'.
Suggestion: stopped
...de and the average temperature is never stop declining. Even though nobody intends t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
... have no places to inhabit. Some may argue that, if we don't save all the spe...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...a new way to cure cancers. Once someone have successfully discovered the blood of th...
^^^^
Line 9, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cies is the result of human activities.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, then, as to, for example, kind of, such as, in my opinion, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2509.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 507.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94871794872 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75501388348 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542406311637 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 815.4 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7337419293 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.476190476 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.21951772744 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21108397496 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067032795627 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10764373809 0.0758088955206 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164501246166 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139572443319 0.0667264976115 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.