While it may be true that we should save endangered species only when the potential extinction is caused by human activities, I strongly disagree with the position in the prompt for two reasons.
First, the argument assume that human are responsible for the endangered species only when they are caused by human activities. However, such assumption might be flawed. Human are responsible for the lives of other species not only because we should take responsibility of our own behavior but because we are the most privileged species around the globe. With advanced technology and industrial equipment, human are usually in the position of advantages when it comes to the struggle for resources. We often say that we should help the poor even if their indigent conditions are not the direct result of the well-off. For the same reason, we should help those animals in need as human are the most dominant and advantageous species around the globe.
While some may argue that human are not responsible for the potential extinction of other species, there is other reason why we should protect endangered species that is not resulted from human activities. It is because such extinction is going to have an irrevocable consequences to the society. The extinction of one kind of animal often results in the disruption of the whole biological chain related to that species. For example, if the endangered species were the predator of the pest in a rural area, the extinction of such species will cause the pest to proliferate, and the crops in that area are going to suffer. Because the extinction of certain species has such tremendous effect, providing protection for these species are not only a manifestation of human ethics, but trying to preclude the negative consequences caused by the disruption in the environmental equilibrium. For that reason, when we protect a certain species in the amazon rainforest, we are actually precluding "the lung of the globe" from losing its environmental and biological balance and ensure its immense ability to ameliorate global warming. Also, some endangered species might have undiscovered usage that are potentially beneficial for human beings. Many drugs that saved tens of thousands of lives are extracted from plants that only grow in certain areas. Had these plants become extinct before we discover their usage, we might not be able to fight against a variety of maladies around the globe.
Providing selectional protection for endangered species might have some merits. For example, we can save money and use it for other purposes. While it might be true, the protection of endangered species are not necessary costly, and it might have profitable results as mentioned in the previous paragraph.
In conclusion, we should protect endangered species even if it is not caused by human activities for two reasons. First, human are the most privileged species around the globe. Second, the extinction of certain species have serious consequences.
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 66
- According to a recent report cheating among college and university students is on the rise However Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeav 69
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field Write 66
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Recently butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States This change however has had little impact 53
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals In a laboratory study of liquid antibacterial hand soaps a concentrated solution of UltraClean produced a 40 percent greater reduction in the bacteria population than did the 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'consequence'?
Suggestion: consequence
...inction is going to have an irrevocable consequences to the society. The extinction of one k...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2526.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 484.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21900826446 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83763974164 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.415289256198 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 802.8 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.246717662 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.818181818 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22727272727 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316556887803 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115886343651 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072055185566 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219886884731 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384868488693 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.