Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Society's responsibilities towards saving wild-life should be humongous. Every life-form is equally important. The earth was created in such a manner that every species in the biosphere is complementary to every other species. They help each other survive and maintain the ecological balance of this plant. Sadly, over the course of the history of civilizations and due to some undenying facts such as drastic changes in climate or in living conditions, many species have been wept-out from the face of the earth. There are many more species that are on the verge on getting decimated. This particularly vulnerable specieses are known as the endangered ones. No matter why they have culminated to their current state, they need to be attended as early as possible.
It is very evident that endangered animals are in desparate need for attention. Human activities, or as they can be called, a necessary evil, are responsible for numerous phenomena affecting the environment, the climate, the earth and even beyond the earth. This is a huge contributing factor that can be attributed to so many different problems including this issue. If a certain group of plants or animals are on the verge of getting wiped out due to the things that the humans do, then without a doubt, this blood is in their hands. It is entirely the human species's burden that they make things right. Even if they are not directly at fault, they should take proper steps to mitigate the problem.
However, one can point out that these human activties are almost inevitable. As far as the growth of the civilization is at play, people are going to have more construction works, they will build more factories, destroy forestlands and whatever it takes to achieve their goal. Even it takes a huge toll, like destroying an entire species, they are willing to take that chance, because "profit-making" is more important to them than saving some plant!
Moreover, they may also argue that a lot of species such as the currently endangered ones, they have been killed-off or vanished from the earth from natural reasons, long before human activities in this colossal scale was a factor. Without the human intervention, there still remains the possibility that natural factors can do worse than what humans are currently doing.
However, humans are evolved and technologically sound more than ever. Many of their inventions can cause havoc, sure, but they have learned to control the enormous power. So, if they wish to preserve something, they can. Currently, the world is in a very alarming position regarding ecodiversity along with many other problems. But, that does not mean that this particular area should be overlooked. More and more efforts should be provided to put equal attention to every species present.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Caveira meyona | 62 | view |
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 50
- When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success. 73
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 50
- As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high. Archaeo 3
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ing factor that can be attributed to so many different problems including this issue. If a cer...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2344.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 460.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09565217391 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8598782477 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536956521739 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 77.1565868147 60.3974514979 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161343611581 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472362303952 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451203308175 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922229622582 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280344330358 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.