The promt states that in order to be successful leaders have two options, either being competitive or being cooperative. It is important to remark that being competitive does not mean not to be cooperative or viceversa, an individual can be competitive and at the same time have a cooperative spirit.
The competitiveness of an individual can lead him to a successful outcome, but at what price? Being competitive can sometimes create a uncomfortable workplace environment, specially if the competitive person does not have a great set of morals. Nevertheless it has been proven that competitiveness can sure improve performance. Take the example of a football player, is he is the only wide receiver In the team, he would not have the inside competition within the team to be better, different that the case of a team with three players for the same position where they need that competitive spirit to be selected as a starter for the next match.
On the other hand cooperation is a great value for a leader. With cooperation a company can grow as a whole and with shared benefits. Imagine the example of two managers in a company, that devote their teams time to help each other and the company at the same time. The dividends received from that alliance could be perceived in a structural way in the whole company. Or it could be the case of two countries that have specific resources that the other does not posses, if that where the case they could potentiate the growth of both countries by signing treaties for the free trade of such resources and thus improving the development of the nations.
To sum up, both caractheristics could make a leader successful, but I consider that a balance between the two of them would be the potential best. Taking the good parts of each a leader can set himself apart from the rest and making not only himself successful but also those surrounding him.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... Being competitive can sometimes create a uncomfortable workplace environment, sp...
^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...on does not have a great set of morals. Nevertheless it has been proven that competitiveness...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a structural way" with adverb for "structural"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...d from that alliance could be perceived in a structural way in the whole company. Or it could be th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, thus, apart from, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 328.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80792682927 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91644339957 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496951219512 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.268264743 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.307692308 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281236306997 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109730381322 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773632218486 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181657823568 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793471371632 0.0667264976115 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 100.480337079 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.