Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
The author of the issue contends that some people are of the opinion that students should base their field of study only on their talents and interests, while some others believe that the availability of jobs is the key factor to choose the field of study. In what follows the main reasons by both groups are first discussed and then my own position would be delineated.
Those who argue for talents and interests as the most important elements to be chosen for educational major seem to believe that success in the future jobs derives from one’s passion and intrinsic abilities. To be compatible with the chosen job and not being bored of what one does it is vital to love your major and have competence over other people who are volunteer for the same job. Having pioneer ideas definitely results in success. Hence, entering a job without any enthusiasm and interest conveys lassitude and failure.
However, others believe that interest and talent are not adequate to find the desirable job in the future. These people give more weight to the economical condition of the society and the available jobs provided for people. For example in rural areas studying in agricultural field might bring a better chance to get a job after graduation rather than studying in management. Geographical position, number of firms and factories, the population of an area can all be determining factors to find a job. Therefore, relying on interests and talents solely does not guaranty the future of a student.
As for my position, I lodge myself somewhere between the two groups. One thing that has not been considered in the second group is that it is not possible to push many students to choose certain jobs and deny their interests and talents because students with various passions and skills should not be confined in a limited domain of study. On the other hand, informing students about the job market and availability of jobs can guide students in the right path. Every field of study requires talented students to be prepared for its own job opportunities, however, the need for certain jobs is few it exists.
In sum, neither overlooking one’s talents nor neglecting the job opportunist does not seem sound for the future of students. Students should obtain information about availability of jobs but they should not disregard their talents and abilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | sandeshbhandari2 | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | shingwa | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | lucy2244 | 79 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | kevlarpeng | 66 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from the chairperson of the school board in the town of Saluda.“for the past five years, Mr. Charles Schade has been the music director at Steel City High School, and during that time the school band from Steel City High 35
- Claim: the best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Reason: only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea. 50
- A group of volunteers participated in a study of consumer responses to the new Luxess face cream. Every morning for a month, they washed their faces with mild soap and then applied Luxess. At the end of that month, most volunteers reported a marked improv 16
- One research study has indicated that many adolescents need more sleep than they are getting, and another study has shown that many high school students in our city are actually dissatisfied with their own academic performance. As a way of combining these 58
- A group of volunteers participated in a study of consumer responses to the new Luxess face cream. Every morning for a month, they washed their faces with mild soap and then applied Luxess. At the end of that month, most volunteers reported a marked improv 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 246, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to job'
Suggestion: to job
...ities. To be compatible with the chosen job and not being bored of what one does it...
^^^
Line 2, column 264, Rule ID: BORED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'bored with'?
Suggestion: bored with
...tible with the chosen job and not being bored of what one does it is vital to love your ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 290, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
...and not being bored of what one does it is vital to love your major and have compe...
^^
Line 2, column 290, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: be
...and not being bored of what one does it is vital to love your major and have compe...
^^
Line 2, column 356, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...r and have competence over other people who are volunteer for the same job. Having pio...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ence over other people who are volunteer for the same job. Having pioneer ideas d...
^^
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it exists. In sum, neither overlooking one's talents nor neglecting the jo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, look, second, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as for, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 396.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98484848485 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63587982712 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522727272727 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7672083316 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.117647059 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2941176471 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409855640872 0.243740707755 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130144094803 0.0831039109588 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142242183853 0.0758088955206 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257982712699 0.150359130593 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130374648097 0.0667264976115 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.