Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Nowadays, arts are available in coffee shops, museum, and streets; however, many people have a problem to be an artist because of a fund problem, therefore, the government funding for art is controversial. Some visionaries argue that government needs to support money to flourish whereas others claim that funding will threaten the integrity of the arts. Admittedly, both ideas are important. As far as I see it, the government should pay enough money to support artists and residents to improve the quality of the arts. However, without considering the disadvantage of the government’s support, it would be erroneous to conclude that government funding is useful for all residents. Therefore, in the following analysis, I would provide evidence to support the position that the funding from the country will beneficial for art industries.
To begin with, one logical explanation for my fundamental agreements is artists can earn sufficient wages. A good example is when Japanese people try to be an artist, they have to pay more than $2000 tuition fee per year for art schools; however, they can earn only a $1300 per month which is under the minimum wage in Japan. As a result, many art students gave up their dream because of financial situations, and this caused declining art industries in Japan. In 2016, five famous museums in Tokyo region closed because no one goes museum because of the quality of arts. Thus, I believe that government funds can support a lot of artists who can generate great quality of arts, so we can improve arts and quality and number of museums.
Furthermore, if a museum’s value would improve, citizens will more interested in arts. The technology improvement declined the visitor of museums because people can see arts through the internet, so more people will go to a museum for arts which have high quality and attracts people. Moreover, today’s entrance fee for an art museum is quite expensive. We have to pay nearly $50 in admission, so more people tend to think that a museum is a luxury place. Hence, if there is the government’s monetary support to improve an artist’s quality and admission fee, many residents might visit and engage for arts, so the arts industries will flourish.
Even with all reasons, however, it would be still too perfunctory to conclude that the supporting from the government is beneficial since there is no denying that the disadvantages of funds in some conditions. Admittedly, if artists can use a lot of money from the nation, the value of arts will change. When many people can become an artist easily, it means that people, who are not great at arts, can become an artist easily, and use the amount of money for invaluable artists. Therefore, we have to consider the usage balance of money.
Consequently, I advocated that supporting money from the country will flourish the art industries of the country. The main reason is that art quality will improve, and the other reason is that people can have more opportunity to see the arts in museums, while I also agree that value of arts will change because the number of artists will increase significantly no matter how many levels of arts they can produce. I want to stress that the usage of money for each artist is quite important. Considering these reasons, it is clear that the government’s fund for art industries is useful.
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette."On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents i 62
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 66
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss 66
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 88
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, while, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2824.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 566.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98939929329 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87757670434 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85793864659 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.429328621908 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 881.1 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8421534818 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54166666667 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367366034369 0.243740707755 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113125278536 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856882821907 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235532787733 0.150359130593 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667567525241 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.