Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The artefacts of an era resembles it's greatness and prosperity. It is essential to preserve the arts so that not only the present generations get inspired but also it leaves a mark on the forthcoming generations.
With the evolution of time period there has been remarkable changes in arts. They have enlightened the pathway for the seekers of art. A government initiative for preserving the antique would ameliorate it's stance. It will not only ensure the protection of art but would also encourage artists and give them a ray of hope.
Firstly, the preceding art has been deteriorating since ages due to improper actions taken to preserve them. The funding provided by the government would prove to be a backbone for the same. It will help the artists grow and flourish. This would also enable easy cash flow for the maintenance of the same. There are so many countries that have supported this kind of suggestion and made sure to take care of their cultures. For example, a country in Europe provides free tickets to all the museums in the first year of arrival. This encourages the foreigners to explore their art and cultures.
Funding of the arts completely might be a bit difficult for the government as it takes a lot of resources to preserve them including infrastructures, maintenance, management, et cetera. The government already has many other departments to look after like research, health, education, army, et cetera that comes under the necessities for any country. So, instead of a full funding it can provide a partial one for the betterment and flourishment of the art.
However, there are other thoughts that might claim the threatening of the art, but till today the art has still been threatened. Better late than never, it will help in fighting with all these root evils.
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 54
- a person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor 16
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 33
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, still, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 304.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94736842105 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83344196196 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575657894737 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4806946192 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5555555556 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260890856929 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782493911869 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649018492057 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142134174348 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527539821687 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.