Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
The author extends that whether the government should fund the art or not. While some people may hold the view that the authority's fund is a danger for the purity of the art; others, on the other hand, may believe that this financial support is an undeniable necessity. I generally agree with the second belief. Among the countless reasons, I will delve into the most conspicuous ones in what follows.
The threshold reason which fortifying my idea is that the art demands expensive substances for the presentation, but it presents a small salary for the artist. As a matter of fact, the art is a field of inspiration and it presentation requires specific materials to illustrate the artist unique idea. These materials such as the paint, special papers, clay and others artistic equipment are really expensive. On the other hand, the income of the artist is lower than other occupation. If they invest their whole incomes for the equipping the atelier, they will not be responsible for their daily requirement for survival. In this case, they are in the dilemma between two choices. According to the noteworthy, intelligence survey conducted in my country, approximately sixty-five percent of the painters in the Tehran, spend their seventy-six percent of their salaries for their job equipment and remain monetary is a tiny amount of among to address their survival. This statistic clearly depicts the importance of the government's fund in the artists’ ability to handle both expenses of the life and art.
The next equally striking factor advocates my outlook is that the government support leads whole society gets familiar with the art. Based on the information presented above, the artists cope with their daily costs by increasing their show's entrance cost. Therefore, solely the people who have a common welfare are capable of gaining advantage of these pieces of arts. However, by the government support which covers a portion of the financial demand of the artist, there is no requirement to increase the show cost. As a result, the majority of people have access to these crucial artistic elements. A vivid example can be given to shed light on the issue is the instance of two art exhibition in my city. There is a fair in our town located at the center of the city. This region covers medium-class dwellers. In this fair two exhibitions of the photography have been presented, which one of them was free. The participants of that free exhibition were threefold more than other. This example lucidly depicts the role of the cost and money as hinder for the people to have a link with art.
Nevertheless, as far as this reason is concerned, I do not agree with the author in some extents. In the case which the governors give the big portion of the support, the artists feel this coercion for attracting the authority's attention. This attracting action can contaminate the integrity of the art since it addresses to the governor appetite rather than the artist's interval inspiration. Actually, this problem can be handled by some well-organized budget which guarantees the continuity of this financial support. Besides, the adherence is based on the artist's innovation and not for the sake of the appealing the authority. In this case, the art can preserve its integrity.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that by the limited roles about the budget division for the artistic work, the governor's support is crucial for the survival of the artist, and it makes the art be available to entire citizens. All in all, there is lists of reasons which support my idea, I present the most evident and comprehensive ones.
- tpo 26 task1 60
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 16
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities."Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly-Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our fast-food 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 80
- If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 364, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'artists'' or 'artist's'?
Suggestion: artists'; artist's
...o the governor appetite rather than the artists interval inspiration. Actually, this pr...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 560, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'artists'' or 'artist's'?
Suggestion: artists'; artist's
... Besides, the adherence is based on the artists innovation and not for the sake of the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 275, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[3]
Message: Did you mean 'there are lists'?
Suggestion: there are lists
...ailable to entire citizens. All in all, there is lists of reasons which support my idea, I pre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'besides', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'such as', 'as a matter of fact', 'as a result', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.254786450663 0.240241500013 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.123711340206 0.157235817809 79% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0810014727541 0.0880659088768 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0309278350515 0.0497285424764 62% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0427098674521 0.0444667217837 96% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134020618557 0.12292977631 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0265095729013 0.0406280797675 65% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77494082007 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0176730486009 0.030933414821 57% => OK
Particles: 0.00147275405007 0.0016655270985 88% => OK
Determiners: 0.167893961708 0.0997080785238 168% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0132547864507 0.0249443105267 53% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0132547864507 0.0148568991511 89% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3673.0 2732.02544248 134% => OK
No of words: 614.0 452.878318584 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98208469055 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.977853291 4.58838876751 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.35016286645 0.366273622748 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.278501628664 0.280924506359 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.192182410423 0.200843997647 96% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138436482085 0.132149295362 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77494082007 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 304.0 219.290929204 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495114006515 0.48968727796 101% => OK
Word variations: 61.7863613373 55.4138127331 111% => OK
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6194690265 150% => OK
Sentence length: 19.8064516129 23.380412469 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6067199213 59.4972553346 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.483870968 141.124799967 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8064516129 23.380412469 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.58064516129 0.674092028746 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 47.6566144794 51.4728631049 93% => OK
Elegance: 2.10447761194 1.64882698954 128% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.572200186118 0.391690518653 146% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0933673853071 0.123202303941 76% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.066950894204 0.077325440228 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.556390440203 0.547984918172 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.163753782028 0.149214159877 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.227703155667 0.161403998019 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102448017934 0.0892212321368 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.614614923377 0.385218514788 160% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0488579803088 0.0692045440612 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.431677907192 0.275328986314 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046511405343 0.0653680567796 71% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.4325221239 192% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.