Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you

It is a common debate whether the government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people, or the government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. Since arts are a vital part of any society, I believe the government should fund the arts in many different ways.

Arts is an integral part of the society's culture and tradition. Different type of arts such as; music, painting, architecture, theatre, and writing reflected the ways of people lives and mirrored their feelings, thoughts even to the smallest details of their daily lives through the history. So the government funding for art is crucial enable to sustain the society's traditions and culture through the generations.

Moreover, public funding of the art makes it accessible to the public. Public art galleries and museums which are available for the public to exhibit increase public involvement in arts. There are many art museums around the world available to the public for reasonable prices. It is wonderful to see families enjoying art and young people interested in examing different kinds of art. young talented artists who need support to start their career in art, the funding of art should be more for institutions more than for individual artists platforms.

On the contrary, government funding for arts should not take a priority over other life aspects. Arts won't thrive in a society with lack of basic needs such as; food, medicine, and education. On the other hand, when the arts flourish in the society, this will make it a hub for people from different places, as a result, the economy will be postponed. Also, the funding of art should be more for institutions more than for individual artists platforms. These institutions may support young talented artists or may support more public art events to increase the awareness about arts.

In conclusion, Arts just like any aspect of society need government funding and support to revive. but funding should be planned and functional.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... the government should fund the arts in many different ways. Arts is an integral part of th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sted in examing different kinds of art. young talented artists who need support ...
^^
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Young
...ed in examing different kinds of art. young talented artists who need support to st...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...vernment funding and support to revive. but funding should be planned and functiona...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 338.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06213017751 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65856513152 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467455621302 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 518.4 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.3919264621 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.647058824 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8823529412 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487149919914 0.243740707755 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182759726499 0.0831039109588 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138550658552 0.0758088955206 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317990769168 0.150359130593 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.17560609215 0.0667264976115 263% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.