“Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts
can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.”
Funds are those amount of money which government provides to the artists and to preserve of art. The given statement is clearly two different perspective of people. According to one group funding for art is important for its pervasiveness. Whereas other say that it threatens the integrity of the arts.
But this all depends upon on the funds are handled and distributed or used so that it can be use rationally.
The points above can be well understood with an example. Suppose, some art sculpture is preserved in the museum. Since these are antique they need some special treatment and were supposed to be preserved with good care. For this, we need some money which definitely comes from the government. At least initially. As later museum tickets can return the money
Apart from this, another reason behind this funding is that establishment of such museum will make these antique available for the public. And many time some very special antiques are displayed in various museums and in the exhibition, to transfer them to care it requires funds. Hence government funding is important for art.
Many times in the name of funding museum administrator use it for their own benefits. And fill their pockets with funding. This happens due to improper distribution and poor mindset of officers. Which raise a question over the funding of arts? If we ensure that no such venal activity happens to fund are good for arts.
Although how the integrity of arts is threatening by funding is not that much clear Since funding also fosters the artists to create some art and it also provides platform to an artist it is necessary. So believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts is not that much concrete and needs some reconsideration.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2016-08-15 | Himanshu Ajmera | 50 | view |
- “Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the artscan flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.” 50
- “Nature's Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products, is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainville. The store should prove to be very successful: Nature's Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas wh 66
- Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One graduate of the course was able to read a 500-page report in only two hours; another graduate rose from an 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...art is important for its pervasiveness. Whereas other say that it threatens the integri...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 281, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ransfer them to care it requires funds. Hence government funding is important for art...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'if', 'so', 'well', 'whereas', 'apart from', 'at least']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.235294117647 0.240241500013 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.170278637771 0.157235817809 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0804953560372 0.0880659088768 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0495356037152 0.0497285424764 100% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0402476780186 0.0444667217837 91% => OK
Prepositions: 0.139318885449 0.12292977631 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0340557275542 0.0406280797675 84% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.67537624601 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.030959752322 0.030933414821 100% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.117647058824 0.0997080785238 118% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0123839009288 0.0249443105267 50% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00928792569659 0.0148568991511 63% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1768.0 2732.02544248 65% => OK
No of words: 299.0 452.878318584 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.91304347826 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.58838876751 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.317725752508 0.366273622748 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.277591973244 0.280924506359 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.173913043478 0.200843997647 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.120401337793 0.132149295362 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67537624601 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 219.290929204 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541806020067 0.48968727796 111% => OK
Word variations: 55.8248170846 55.4138127331 101% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 14.95 23.380412469 64% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5599344931 59.4972553346 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4 141.124799967 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.95 23.380412469 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.45 0.674092028746 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 42.7091973244 51.4728631049 83% => OK
Elegance: 1.57142857143 1.64882698954 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.597719460321 0.391690518653 153% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0815556739067 0.123202303941 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0837413170349 0.077325440228 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.502936817992 0.547984918172 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.185359954135 0.149214159877 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200899898358 0.161403998019 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151754015142 0.0892212321368 170% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.235166635891 0.385218514788 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.082566853575 0.0692045440612 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.346406172938 0.275328986314 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154809661422 0.0653680567796 237% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88274336283 184% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.