Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are unwarranted, based on the existing evidence for global climate change.
Global climate change has been the burning issue since the last decade, or so. The unusual change in climatic conditions has been so unpredictable lately. The issue relates to the human population and their use of natural resources. People have been consuming, if not exploiting, the natural resources in a large amount. The issue presents that people should cut energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle and not exploiting the resources as a result of global climate change. I agree with the issue although such a drastic change in lifestyle, to make up for the current global climatic change, might not be guaranteed.
With the rapid growth of the human population, their needs and demands are ever so rising. To fulfill their needs, the first thing they consume is the natural resources around them. For instance, people rely on forests for the construction of houses which leads to deforestation. And as we all know deforestation eventually leads to global warming as the amount of oxygen produced decreases. If people could rely less on natural resources for fulfilling their basic needs by adjusting their lifestyle, then the problem of global climate change can be lessened to some extent.
In addition to the exploitation of forests, the rise in the human population also leads to an increase in the number of industries, factories, and urbanization. The industries consume a lot of natural resources and produce a huge amount of waste materials and harmful gases, which has a direct impact on global climate change. If people could live without extravagant demands for material goods being produced from factories, then the negative effect of such industries on the environment would be less as they will be running in lesser numbers. Further, if people could arrange their settlement in the countrysides and not exploiting the arable lands in the name of urbanization, natural resources could be protected which will have a positive impact on the global climate.
Although the change in people's lifestyles can have a great impact on global climate change, we are not quite sure whether today's humans would be able to change their living or not. Looking at the trend on the last two to three-decade, people have been accustomed to live in the state of adverse climatic conditions and would do a little in adjusting their lifestyle in response to the situation of the global ecosystem.
To sum up, the adverse effect of global climate change is rising day by day and soon our planet might become an unsuitable place to live. Thus, looking at the near future, people should change their current lifestyle and rely less on natural resources for sustainment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | Jeet Thkaur | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | bhavna288 | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ulligadda sreeja | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ulligadda sreeja | 50 | view |
- Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will 50
- A recent survey of 250 adults between the ages of 30 and 45 showed an association between the number of hours adults spend online each day and the self-reporting of symptoms commonly associated with depression. The survey found that adults who spend 30 ho 82
- Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are 50
- Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are 50
- "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen mo 35
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 610, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for the current global climatic change, might not be guaranteed. With the r...
^^
Line 1, column 637, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...matic change, might not be guaranteed. With the rapid growth of the human popul...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...stries on the environment would be less as they will be running in lesser numbers....
^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[4]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'accustomed to living'.
Suggestion: accustomed to living
...t two to three-decade, people have been accustomed to live in the state of adverse climatic condit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so, then, thus, for instance, in addition, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2249.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 442.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08823529412 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75541555095 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4592760181 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 703.8 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0164580816 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.368421053 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2631578947 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63157894737 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312716392254 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104563221323 0.0831039109588 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755878392297 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190631905539 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561513468939 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.