Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are unwarranted, based on the existing evidence for global climate change.
Global climate change, a critical issue faced by the world has many factors to occur such as uneven use of natural resources, release of toxic gasses in environment and many more. The prompt stating to reduce the comsumption energy essential makes is an unrelieable solution to tackle with the global climate change. Thus, I would mostly disagree with the given prompt for two reasons.
To begin with, the climate is a world wide scenario, so it require the contribution of the nations of the world not just the developed one. The steps taken by the developed nations to control the climate change world wide will be nullified if the developing nations do not controls the other factors causing climate change. The industries operating in the developing nations plays a major role in creating the detrimental effect that leads to global climate change. This can be exemplified by comparing a developed nation and a developing nation. In India, a developing nation, many chemical industries do not fellow the rules and guidlines given by the CPCB (Central Pollution Control Board). These industries without a proper treatment to their waste release their toxic waste in the environment, causing global warming. Thus, even if people in United States, a developed nation, reduce their consumption of energy won't solve the "Gobal" climate change to a great extent. Hence, unless and until the whole world, not just the "developed" nations comes together to address climatic issue, taking a concrete stand to reduce the factors, the climatic change cannot be stigmatized.
Further, only by reducing the consumption of energy cannot essential prevent the global climate change. To control the climate change we need to find some alternate sourcces to extract energy. Lot of scientific researrch and technological developments are required efficiently extract the energy from renewable resources (the one which can used infinite number of times without causing any detrimental effects on nature) so as to reduce the use to non-renewable resources (one which onces used cannot be used again and may cause an impact on the nature). For instance, about 80% world's requirement electricity is fullfilled by burning coal, a non-renewable source of energy, in electricity generation power plant. Coal extracted from nature, majorly containing carbon and ash, when burnt produces smoke and other gasses that increases global warming, ulltimately leading to the climate change. Hence, to reduce the coal comsumption and thus protect the evnironment from climate change we need to increase the use of renewable sources such as solar power, wind energy at reasonable cost making a relieable alternative.
Contrastly, one would argue that reducing the energy comsumption of people would ultimately reduce the global warming leading to better climatic conditions and a more suitable lifestyle. But, do only humans consume energy? There many more things in this world that requires energy to operate which cannot be stop since they are required for smooth functioning of the world. Thus, for concluding I would says that energy consumption of people as well as other factors needs to be taken under consideration to control the global climate change.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | Jeet Thkaur | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | bhavna288 | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ulligadda sreeja | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ulligadda sreeja | 50 | view |
- Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle given the evidence for global climate change Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are u 66
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...ns. To begin with, the climate is a world wide scenario, so it require the contributio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...ns. To begin with, the climate is a world wide scenario, so it require the contributio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'requires'?
Suggestion: requires
...climate is a world wide scenario, so it require the contribution of the nations of the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...d nations to control the climate change world wide will be nullified if the developing nat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...d nations to control the climate change world wide will be nullified if the developing nat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'control'?
Suggestion: control
...lified if the developing nations do not controls the other factors causing climate chang...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...using any detrimental effects on nature so as to reduce the use to non-renewable resourc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 405, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'say'
Suggestion: say
...the world. Thus, for concluding I would says that energy consumption of people as we...
^^^^
Line 7, column 545, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n to control the global climate change.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, thus, well, as to, for instance, such as, as well as, to begin with, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2747.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 512.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.365234375 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85769820947 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490234375 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 877.5 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.933910235 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.80952381 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.380952381 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305905155614 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102912682914 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485619874739 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190117322245 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453733058609 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.