Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
Moral lessons are crucial chores in one's nurturing. There are different ways by which society teaches these lessons in order to create a moral society. Some people assert that morality should be foundational step of education, while other say that rationality must play eminent role in education to ensure that society produced has morality. In my opinion more emphasis should be placed on logical reasoning in education than in building a education curriculum whose primary foundation is to teach morality. I believe this for two reasons.
To begin with, pragmatic thinking gets developed when core foundation of our education is entrenched upon logical reasoning. People in such society do not gets swayed by their emotions and always weigh gravity of situation before making any decision. Take an example of organization whose only goal is to teach particular mores related to a society and keep principles before logic. When faced by an abberant scenario people who have been nurtured in these society are likely to treat situation as something unusual - as it didn't fit according to their traditions - and rather than critically thinking to get way past it, they will either panic or take a folly path to deal with it. Practical thinking ensures that at each step whenever something eccentric comes around we have sufficient reasoning ability to get through it with flying colors.
Additionally, when the foundation of education places to much emphasis on morality rather than critical thinking then people of such society frustrate further growth and development that can likely happen in the society's upliftment. For instance students who are taught only the religious teaching from very young age take every decision based on what they have been taught. Imagine a scenario where same sex marriage has been taught as immoral act in a religion and such preaching are embedded in people thought process do you think it would be easy to mobilize such societies to accept this? Pragmatic thinking shapes our mind to be open minded and take every decision by weighing pros and cons and embrace new changes that happen around us.
Some people might still say that morality keeps society intact and saves it from getting prodigal and irreverent. But these people forget that reverence of some oddity is totally absent in such society moreover surveys have shown pragmatic thinker to be equally respectful to others as moral thinker.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-21 | RIYA MODI | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | jayatyagi123@yahoo.co.in | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-07 | Aaishani De | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-21 | raghavchauhan619 | 62 | view |
| 2022-09-30 | Mufaddal Rangwala | 50 | view |
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner Over the past two years the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically Many Central Pl 80
- A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10 in order to ensure a quality product As you know we are working with a first time director whose only previous exper 63
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons whe 78
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as mu 60
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada s arctic regions They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough at le 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 439, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...reasoning in education than in building a education curriculum whose primary foun...
^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'get'?
Suggestion: get
...easoning. People in such society do not gets swayed by their emotions and always wei...
^^^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... before logic. When faced by an abberant scenario people who have been nurtured i...
^^^
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this society' or 'these societies'?
Suggestion: this society; these societies
...enario people who have been nurtured in these society are likely to treat situation as someth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... situation as something unusual - as it didnt fit according to their traditions - and...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...when the foundation of education places to much emphasis on morality rather than c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, still, then, while, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2045.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17721518987 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56020527827 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594936708861 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6973724351 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.8125 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6875 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403562885834 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122405578183 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860770626342 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250255936224 0.150359130593 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147665042858 0.0667264976115 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.