Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
__________
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
When moral values join hands with logical reasoning, clubbed with hard work, dedication, and perseverance, they form a solid intellectual rational society. The prompt given showcases two contrasting views discussing whether morality or logical reasoning should be believed to produce a good society. I would partially agree with both views and would suggest considering both of them at par when building the foundation of education in society. To support my stand, I'll consider a few situations.
When we look at people like Dr. Abdul Kalam, who is a great scientist from India, is a person who had valued humanity and served the world with love. He is considered to be the epitome of success where he educated himself well and then showed magical scientific treasures to the world. Had he not taught morality right from his young days, he would have never accepted this kind of attitude. Teaching morality plays a very important role so that educated people do not deceive others, and work for the good of the world. We have seen so many examples where someone met an accident and people are either busy clicking their picture of not giving any attention as they are late to work. Is this the kind of world we want? Not at all. Morality or Humanity is something that should be given the highest value, even above the monetary needs.
On the other hand, logical reasoning builds another essential pillar to support society. Nowadays, logical reasoning is also a part of assessment tests for jobs or for higher studies. The reason for the proliferation of the need for logic is that the world now is facing terrible problems that one could never imagine. In the world of Al, where digital crimes are taking place, trust in morality seems vanishing. In such a situation logic plays a very important role. To deal with innovative problems, a logical mindset, and creative approach are required. Only then can we attain the impossible. For example, some people have a fear that computers or robots will take all their jobs in the near future, but logical minds consider this as just another hindrance because somewhere they know that the human mind is the most flexible machine and that only we can find caves of innovation that AI can not.
People might just pick up a certain view and support it. I feel that we must have both morality and logic to fight the odds. The world will throw various problems at us. At times moral values will bolster our affection for the needy, and instill a feeling to help them, and correspondingly, our logic to solve a certain problem will provide the solution to it. We are all humans. The only religion that we should follow is humanity. People can stand strong with their moral principles, but they can be stronger with morality conciliates with logical reasoning, making a breakthrough to the impossibilities in this world.
Society is made up of several categories of people. But the building blocks of any society are its children. Right from the beginning, they should be given lessons on building moral values and having logic behind everything they do. If such values are instilled in education, then they can probably face the adversities of their life with a calmer patient attitude.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-21 | RIYA MODI | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | jayatyagi123@yahoo.co.in | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-07 | Aaishani De | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-21 | raghavchauhan619 | 62 | view |
| 2022-09-30 | Mufaddal Rangwala | 50 | view |
- Even though young people often receive the advice to follow your dreams more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals Many people s dreams are inherently selfish Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with 50
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- Claim Even though young people often receive the advice to follow your dreams more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals Reason Many people s dreams are inherently selfish Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 50
- Topic As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensive but more complex and mysterious 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 466, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
...cation in society. To support my stand, Ill consider a few situations. When we loo...
^^^
Line 1, column 470, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Ill) must be used with a third-person verb: 'considers'.
Suggestion: considers
...on in society. To support my stand, Ill consider a few situations. When we look at peop...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, still, then, well, for example, i feel, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2686.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 550.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88363636364 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56300185571 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 215.323595506 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516363636364 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 835.2 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.982247805 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6451612903 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7419354839 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.93548387097 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21534159561 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523399448079 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553936409043 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123811758208 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416998297256 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.