Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.

Essay topics:

Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.

Morality is important in a society. It tells people the difference between good and bad and creates a sense in mind which encourages people to do good things and avoid bad things. Teaching morality is like spoon feeding to a child, the child will blindly believe and assume whatever the parents, teachers or elders are teaching is correct, moral and ethical and should be done without giving any thought and utilizing the brain. Why do we actually need a moral society? One of the possible answers to this question could be that in a moral society, there will be lesser crimes, lesser sufferings and more happiness. For maintaining happiness and harmony, a society and its people should learn moral aspects.

However, if morality is directly feed into students' mind, they might not be able to think beyond it. For them, whatever they have learnt would be correct and they will always oppose what others might try to do out of it which might be good for their own happiness. For an instance, traditions like arrange marriages or same-caste marriages or eating veg food for Brahmins are few of the things which were highly considered moral and ethical once but not anymore. People have started marrying people from other casts and even other religions, Brahmins have started eating non-veg food. Indeed, all the traditions, morals and ethics are required to be examined and changed after a period of time.

Moreover, students learn the foundation of logical reasoning to understand what is wrong or what is right, things would be far better. The society would be more peaceful and happy. People will adapt to new things and changes quickly instead of being dogmatic to their own philosophy. Consider, the same example as above, on contrary, these kind of people can understand that marriages should not have a barrier of castes and will allow their kids to marry inter castes.

Therefore, the society, its students or its people should be taught the foundation of logical reasoning so that they can easily grasp the difference between right and wrong, adapt to new conditions, be open minded, understand the need of hour, analyse things well and then react. This way the people of the society will be more happier and which is why a society needs mores, ethics & values.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-14 srujanakeerthi 50 view
2019-12-14 srujanakeerthi 50 view
2019-12-14 srujanakeerthi 50 view
2019-12-03 Opak Pulu 50 view
2019-11-30 abhbat 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user rahulsingh773 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 680, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ired to be examined and changed after a period of time. Moreover, students learn the founda...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...the same example as above, on contrary, these kind of people can understand that marriages...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 324, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'happier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: happier
...s way the people of the society will be more happier and which is why a society needs mores,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 384.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93489583333 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41691626459 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526041666667 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7309710383 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.470588235 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5882352941 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23529411765 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348675437823 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111698399561 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557515248953 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202666274677 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760011944713 0.0667264976115 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.