Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
Moral science has been a spearhead in spreading awareness about one's conscience since elementary education. A child can be taught with moral principle before he/she starts understanding the world without any sense of logic around. Though reasoning basing upon facts or assumptions might produce a society of conscience, but if not checked at initial times then might turn something ugly.
Rudimentary education has been the key in driving one's mind to follow according to predefined regulations that improves morality around our environment. Hence, morality can be thought as a foundation of education if it is practicable in areas where literacy is at its full pace. For instance, if a child steals something valuable from friends or family members then the child should be taught with morality on the grounds of education in order to reform; whereas the same might not be possible if a teenager or an adult who is obdurate or lack conscience.
There have been many other subjects that are taught in primary, secondary schools, colleges, graduate schools. However, not only moral science but other areas also add ample support to build a moral society such as environmental awareness which gives an all around support to a student who has to learn the different aspects of society consisting of all other fields that will nurture his/her morality which they have imbibed since elementary times.
Recently, in India there has been a rise of intolerance among students in a particular university who are raising discordant voices in opposing the government without any backdrop of the ideas involved taking forward a country to peak. In case, they were provided good moral education in primary or secondary education they might had built there morality on the grounds of formal education that provides justification to oneself. The example stated may uphold the theory of sustaining morality within ourselves for a fruitful society that will promote better moral principles among the masses as well.
There can be other views that qualify the above observations, when logical reasoning comes into place that gives people to think logically depending on various premises of a particular situation. The point can be validated, if people in the JNU University had collective information about the government initiatives and educational support or handling communal issues. Then such a situation would not have taken place, as reasoning substantiates any illogical evidence and strives to make understand about the society we are living.
The difference between the two views is tenuous as both buttress the moral society by contributing at times needed. A principled oriented society can be achieved if people value their foundations in education through ethics and use rational thinking that can strive for a better living in the community.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Opak Pulu | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | abhbat | 50 | view |
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'whereas', 'as to', 'for instance', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252049180328 0.238963963785 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.168032786885 0.154291517835 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.106557377049 0.0886310499679 120% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0389344262295 0.0506014161523 77% => OK
Pronouns: 0.016393442623 0.0449626384858 36% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135245901639 0.123526278965 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0635245901639 0.0379742944744 167% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82927350575 2.82910677849 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0204918032787 0.0316879551592 65% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0014075125626 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0922131147541 0.0950106342287 97% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.030737704918 0.0245489744465 125% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.030737704918 0.0157978311181 195% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2860.0 2899.98275862 99% => OK
No of words: 451.0 478.390804598 94% => OK
Chars per words: 6.34146341463 6.0591788892 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.65681771538 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.416851441242 0.369966551584 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.341463414634 0.285172536893 120% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.237250554324 0.207245337619 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.159645232816 0.136322040163 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82927350575 2.82910677849 100% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 234.298850575 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554323725055 0.492565540709 113% => OK
Word variations: 66.3132556886 56.8184620615 117% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 21.1264367816 76% => OK
Sentence length: 28.1875 23.7468607788 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7157503762 62.0618507366 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.75 143.81877709 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1875 23.7468607788 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 0.728815259664 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.87931034483 123% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.71264367816 0% => OK
Readability: 62.3338414634 52.2641144681 119% => OK
Elegance: 2.01834862385 1.64547068916 123% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309117011564 0.39480681544 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0703189124785 0.11556216369 61% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0394275896209 0.0736162880345 54% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.57581359619 0.531340600358 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.118727235222 0.15197228837 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11443132391 0.158818324754 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419095253702 0.0851127212816 49% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.25224084334 0.388921930462 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0475508227012 0.0677916285025 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176568457542 0.28015025965 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328701011187 0.0610219844235 54% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.8591954023 64% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30459770115 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.96264367816 161% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 8.10632183908 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.93390804598 25% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 7.0 3.04597701149 230% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 15.0862068966 99% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 82.5 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 5.0 Out of 6