Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal. Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus.
Implementing a goal of politics is a complicated process in any country, as it is not an one man thing to complete but require lot of humans to complete one goal, and no human is perfect at all times or at least, all the humans in the process are not perfect at all times. So, goal of politics is not plausible to be pursuit of ideal.
I would agree with later argument provided in the statement, as it sounds a pragmatic approach to achieve a goal of politics. For instance, government want to construct a water reservoir for the irrigation needs. Here, if we consider ideal goal, then government wants to construct within 1 year to complete all the process which includes acquiring required land and evacuation of the people from the low lying areas where people would affect. But this cannot happen as people may retaliate the approach of government, until a pragmatic approach to solve this like government needs to discuss with the people who would affect and need to get reasonable consensus between them like government should ensure compensation and shelter post evacuation process.
Another instance can be like government has the goal to improve the industrial economy by passing the law to accept 100% FDI(foreign direct investment) which looks an ideal process, but this may be affect general public mostly whose income is based on small/medium scale business. So here pragmatic approach would be to change the laws so as that it won’t affect the public by finding a common ground which would benefit both the economy of the country and the public.
In the end, I would like to say government bodies or politics should work on goals based on Practical approach which would not affect the public and at the same time it should benefit the public by looking at the common grounds.
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 50
- Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal. Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus. 50
- While some leaders in government, sports, industry, and other areas attribute their success to a well-developed sense of competition, a society can better prepare its young people for leadership by instilling in them a sense of cooperation. 50
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as 33
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in an 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ed process in any country, as it is not an one man thing to complete but require l...
^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ccept 100% FDI foreign direct investment which looks an ideal process, but this m...
^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...n ideal process, but this may be affect general public mostly whose income is based on small m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, then, at least, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 311.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80707395498 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56139549671 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527331189711 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.002351525 60.3974514979 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.111111111 118.986275619 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.5555555556 23.4991977007 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260680787537 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120640974855 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943154866316 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154669703198 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203900394583 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 14.1392134831 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 48.8420337079 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.