Politics is filled with controversial arguments throughout human history. Great thinkers such as Plato or Karl Marx had their ideal of how politics should work and firmly believes human civilization should move towards their ideal. In reality, urgent current issue like poverty, sanitation, starvation, are usually contradicted with those idea and requires compromise from all parties involved. I believe the pursuit of an ideal is always the motivation to the prosperity of human race, while reaching common ground and compromises are often the pragmatic method to achieve this goal.
In history, great philosophers and politicians advocated various theories on how human society and government should evolve and develop. Plato, ancient Greek philosopher, believed that ideal kingdom should lead by philosopher king. Karl Marx, eminent thinker in 20 century, claimed that communism is the goal human society should aim for and capitalism was build on exploiting of working class. Many modern country also adopted the various form of democracy, which certainly have its merits and shortcomings. Furthermore, we have ordinary people advocates their politics ideals such as feminism, eradicating discrimination towards sexual orientation, race and age. All of above are different form of pursuit of an ideal, They formed the foundation of today's world and direct us to further strive for a better tomorrow.
While these ideal might be compatible in some cases, they are often drastically contradicted to each other. We have seen war between Communism and western country. These wars brought enormously pain to people involved. In these cases, reaching to a common ground will largely diminishing the disaster brought on these countries.
Even we temporally forget the fighting between different political ideals, there are tensions within one political government. Providing more job to industrial workers might be contradicted to the need of environmentalist. In this situation, insisting on any form of ideal would not be the most rational decision. Discussion and compromising would be the most reasonable method a government can undertake.
Overall, pursuit of an ideal should always be the motivation of the politicians in any government. Human need a direction towards tomorrow. However, in order to achieve this ideal, we have to communicate to different ideas and reach the common ground. Insisting on one ideal would do harm to all parties involved in the issue.
- Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal. Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own 70
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 58
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 91
- Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own 88
- The following appeared on theWeb site Science News Today.“In a recent survey of more than 5,000 adolescents, the teens who reported eating the most meals with their families were the least likely to use illegal drugs, tobacco, or alcohol. Family meals w 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 334, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this idea' or 'those ideas'?
Suggestion: this idea; those ideas
...arvation, are usually contradicted with those idea and requires compromise from all partie...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
... king. Karl Marx, eminent thinker in 20 century, claimed that communism is the goal hum...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'diminish'
Suggestion: diminish
...eaching to a common ground will largely diminishing the disaster brought on these countries...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, while, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 379.0 442.535393258 86% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54881266491 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93856780816 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572559366755 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1789705778 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5909090909 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2272727273 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95454545455 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27924518528 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717563160637 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486780703145 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14683720329 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257696730644 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.