Imagine the earth fully covered of concrete, meters high in the sky. It may amuse most of us seeing the heights man has achieved but at the bottom of heart, we all can feel that something very important is missing. In a world developed so high, a mere ethereal sight of flora and fauna would be all that most of us would desire. For all the potential economic gains that can be materialized we all should understand the cost that we will have to bear in terms of lose of nature. There are several consequences that will emerge if economic gains get priority over wilderness.
To begin with, construction destroys the natural habitation of plants as well as animals, leaving them homeless, wandering to lands unknown and paths precarious. Hoping to catch some prey for the starving stomach, weak and stranded these specious meet their demise. This is an obscured reality, it actually happens in the forests that are chopped for fulfilling the demands of land.
Moreover, developing in the areas that are natural habitats for various specious leaves no choice to the animals and birds other than either adapting to this new environment or migrating to some other place. Those who choose not to migrate, once in a while have an encounter with the neighboring humans, which endangers both lives. For example, several cases of Cheetah and Coyote attacks have been reported in densely populated areas of Delhi in India.
Additionally, the construction affects surrounding fauna, by damaging the air and water through pollution. Very frequently we all get to read articles that present the impact of decreasing level air quality. Almost all the metropolitan cities are suffering the decline in air quality. This is only because not enough plantation is present around these enormously constructed metro cities. Take for an example, the recent clouds of smog that surrounded major cities in China and India for weeks.
Conversely, some will argue that it is important that we develop the potential sites for their economic gains. Yes, that should be done provided that precautions has been taken to preserve the resident flora and fauna. City plans can consider leaving space of greenery, and no trespassing should be allowed in areas where the animal husbandry is preserved. Human safety can be confirmed with high mounted walls and protective fences around such natural parks.
Conclusively, it is very important to consider the impact which is caused by never ending human demands on mother nature. Both the nature and development are crucial for human being and therefore equal importance should be given to both.
- News stories on TV and in newspaper are very often accompanied by pictures.Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.What is your opinion about this? 61
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In 66
- In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most c 83
- Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think that it is awaste of valuable money. What is your opinion? 11
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posit 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, conversely, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2194.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09048723898 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61273092897 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580046403712 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7744506162 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.7272727273 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5909090909 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232012742692 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588551605029 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540093952641 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115037711527 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592186613848 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.