Cinema impacts human thinking, either in a profound fashion or a minute way. The audience who consumes audio-visual content, particularly children and young adults, is highly susceptible to the nature of ideas being expressed and eventually imbibe a certain degree of it into their behavior. In this scenario, it becomes imperative to pay heed to the potentially deleterious effects of violent and obscene material distributed through mass media. Therefore, I mostly agree with the above statement for three different reasons.
First, famous personalities have a profound role in the development of youth. For example, youngsters who follow the actor Johnny Depp are likely to be influenced by his movies (such as the Pirates of the Caribbean) which, in turn, can lead the younger population to form a predilection for seafaring, ships, and the navy. Similarly, actors playing either heroic or villainous roles in films, who resort to violence to settle issues, are instilling a sense of belligerence in the young hoi polloi. To mitigate the negative consequences, the stars must stand up and act. This is true and strengthens the statement.
Second, financial resources are the most fruitful when used for benevolent purposes. For example, if a movie star decides to live lavishly rather than contributing to social causes, can encourage acquisitiveness in the viewers. If celebrities contribute to alleviating societal issues, it can positively impact the mindset of the youth, making them more helpful and compassionate toward others. This makes the statement presented highly creditable.
Third, movies have a wide impact on the thought process of teenagers. For instance, if an actor or actress who is highly popular among adolescents agrees to play increasingly negative roles in movies can encourage the viewers to act accordingly or even maliciously. In this manner, cinema can pose an insidious threat to societal functioning. However, these deleterious effects can be mitigated if the concerned artist stands up and volunteers awareness programs to clarify the reality to the young audience. Thus, the statement does actually hold water.
In conclusion, although many would endorse the idea that film idols have absolute freedom over their actions, this belief can pose dire ramifications given the impact made on the psychology of young people. The youth if exposed to harmful content for prolonged periods can permanently affect their outlook on life. Therefore, it is important that the stars pay attention to their behavior and roles and act in a way that proves salubrious for the growth of the youth. Those who ignore the statement are highly oblivious and do such imprudence at their own peril.
- Super Screen movie 54
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places
- Sports stars movie stars have an obligation to behave as role models for the young people who look up to them In return for the millions of dollars that they are paid we should expect them to fulfill this societal responsibility 83
- television is entirely democratic in that its content is controlled by what the people want 58
- Some people believe that traveling to and living in numerous places increases one s ability to relate and connect to other people Others believe that this ability is better cultivated by living in one place and developing a deep understanding of that comm 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a profound fashion" with adverb for "profound"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
Cinema impacts human thinking, either in a profound fashion or a minute way. The audience who consu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... statement presented highly creditable. Third, movies have a wide impact on the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, but, first, however, if, look, second, similarly, so, still, then, therefore, third, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2297.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 427.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3793911007 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94024722117 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6018735363 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.1461979105 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.409090909 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4090909091 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.40909090909 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228263513119 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593055436068 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034316089333 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125818396233 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385783593765 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.