The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but the general well-being of all its people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The above statement presents the holistic perspective that one must have when evaluating a nation’s greatness. As mentioned, the phrase ‘general well-being of all its people’ points to the very hallmark of a great society where the growth and prosperity has been inclusive. When citizens from all classes - working, business and the state, have an opportunity to create a decent life and career for themselves, can one claim that the nation is progressing.
Inclusive, all-round development means that the basic needs of its citizens, such as access to education, healthcare and employment irrespective of class has been established. This requires citizens from all strata of the society to be able to pursue their aspirations and support a certain standard of living.
Achievements of the state, artists and scientists are all important for a nation’s progress but these are contributing factors and not exclusive in making a nation great. Doctors, defense, academicians, skilled labor are all important to make a nation great. Moreover, a nation that fosters the environment and policies of inclusiveness can produce the best of scientists, artists, statesmen.
To conclude, a nation that focuses on an all-round inclusive development which in turn supports the general well-being of all its citizens can be considered a great nation.
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 83
- The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but the general well-being of all its people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developin 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...best of scientists, artists, statesmen. To conclude, a nation that focuses on an...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 58.6224719101 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 2235.4752809 52% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 208.0 442.535393258 47% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54326923077 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.55969084622 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24454131942 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 215.323595506 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600961538462 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 704.065955056 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5844937733 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 128.111111111 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242657196023 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099150178491 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072399119232 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157347003358 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779465692461 0.0667264976115 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.1639044944 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.38706741573 119% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.