Teachers' salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students.
The role teachers play in the making of a better society has always been clear to governments. They are pivotal and fundamental for the achievement of the smartest and most erudite possible citizens. More over, they create the future class of thinkers and scientists.
For these reasons, their salaries are, for sure, something goverments should deeply care about, as they can define the features of a teacher. As a matter of fact, indeed, workers often qualify their importance in a society in proportion to their incomes, and their images can be different in front of the others just because of the salary. Hence, great attention is required to decide whether or not to adopt a policy that changes teachers' salaries as the academic performance of their students increases or decreases. The wrong circumstances could, in fact, be deleterious for the role of a teacher.
To begin with, not every class of students react in the same way to a teaching session. Is a concrete and almost trite evidence that, in every school, some classes are better than other, although their teachers are the same. In fact, there are several reasons for students not to achieve high grades and accolades that do not depend on the ability of a teacher. Thus, it could happen that, when applied a policy similar to the one stated above, a professor can see his salary decurted even if his work has been perfect, just beacause his students do not respond in the cunning and expected way to the lessons.
Consequently, this could result in a number of consequences that could eventually ruin the role of a teacher. In fact, when a teacher is less payed than an other, namely, when he is not recognized for his abilities as a teacher, his student could percieve it and have an even worse idea of the teacher himselft. As it is clear, a lower salary can be construed as a lower ablitiy of the teacher as far as it is tantamount to the academic performance of the students. Hence, it is unobjectionable that such a policy can dramatically exacerbate the authority of a teacher.
Nevertheless, there is also a more intern, personal factor. No teacher should be extremely stressed on the performance of his students. If it is undoubted that good grades achievements by the class must be a central focus for a professor, it has indeed also to be deemed correct that lessons should not only be spent to prepare students for their performances. There is so much more than this in the preparation of citizens, scientists and researches that a professor should not feel anxious about performances and be free to deepen students' knowledge about non-assessed subjects and aspects of culture. How would this be even possible if he had the duress og having a poorer salary if his students do not prove to be prepared enough? And, even worst, what is the meter of assessment to judge the "academic performance of the students" that could ruin a professor economic incomes?
For, in fact, there is also the chance that the assessment method could be too fragile or imperfect, as to alter the real performances of the students. This way, teachers could be punished for not having greatly teached to their students, whereas the truth is that they tought them different or just subtedly different notions and lessons. To apply such a policy it would mandatory to design a perfect assessment method, but it is to be considered almost impossible as there is no unique way of teaching things.
Aligning to the point of view above expounded, requiring teacher to expect their salary to be lowered if, for any reasons, their students do not perform as predicted is a harming and counter-productive policy. In fact, it would prevent teacher from having a perfectly equal fame and the authority they need to teach productively, and it would also make them too much oppressed by the assessment of their students' performance that they could feel nonplussed and unable to skilfully teach.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-02 | bmartinurcelay | 58 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | adamvg | 75 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | 08sandip | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | Navis | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves. 70
- Teachers' salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students. 66
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals. 16
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small-business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe."A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. Currently, the nearest jazz club is 65 miles aw 78
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
..., great attention is required to decide whether or not to adopt a policy that changes teachers...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
...fact, when a teacher is less payed than an other, namely, when he is not recognized for ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, nevertheless, so, thus, whereas, as to, in fact, as a matter of fact, to begin with, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 37.0 19.5258426966 189% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 33.0505617978 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3294.0 2235.4752809 147% => OK
No of words: 673.0 442.535393258 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89450222883 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.09335287823 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83865781348 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 299.0 215.323595506 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444279346211 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1023.3 704.065955056 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8153388398 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.692307692 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8846153846 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356800123476 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109505527886 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928761094578 0.0758088955206 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18852128047 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0989342056324 0.0667264976115 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 158.0 100.480337079 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.