Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
The first role models and heroes of young children many a time happen to be their teachers. The art of nurturing and guiding young talents especially in an academic arena is a huge responsibility for teachers. At times, their job involves guiding students on moral responsibilities as well. Though the intention of the management might be to encourage teachers to perform better by penalizing them on the basis of academic performances, it might be counterproductive.
Each batch of students come with a myriad of characteristics and talents. Some might be academically inclined while others may be artistic or exhibit great athletic skills. It is not possible for every student to have an inclination to study. The class that performs best are always where both the students and the teacher are in symphony with each other.
Judging a teacher solely based on ranking in academic performance is biased and unreasonable. For example, under a particular teacher the students might have bettered their understanding and performances compared to their previous results. They may not score the highest but the improvement in their scores might suggest the calibre of the teacher. On the other hand there might be a naturally good performing class and the teacher may not really have had a role to play in their amazing performance in the examinations. Therefore a holistic approach in appraising the teachers must be avoided.
The knowledge imparted by a teacher is at par only when it is done with passion and with the intent to help students to understand the subject. When a teacher is adjudged solely on the basis of the end results, it might create a pressure on them to achieve targets. It creates a shift in their teaching paradigm. They might be forced to change the method they teach which might shift focus from teaching for the sake of teaching to teaching for self-conceited gains.
A factor that needs to be considered is if academic performances are taken into account, who would be responsible for setting the question papers to test the students. It would be jocular if the teachers are graded on the basis of the papers set by themselves. There are high possibilities that they may indulge in unfair practices such as limiting the portion of study, setting some fairly easy questions for the students to answer etc. Only if there is some board or committee who is responsible for conducting the examinations, the performances of the students can be used to denote the capability of the teachers.
All the above factors lead to a conclusion that it is best not to appraise teachers on the basis of academic performances of their students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | terraventu | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | bashirheidari | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | yswang | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 50 | view |
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in mon 16
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 50
- "One month ago, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one-third of what it used to be. Although actual readings of water usage before and after the adjustment 43
- "Over the past year, the Crust Copper Company (CCC) has purchased over 10,000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia. Mining copper on this land will inevitably result in pollution and, since West Fredonia is the home of several enda 63
- When Stanley Park first opened, it was the largest, most heavily used public park in town. It is still the largest park, but it is no longer heavily used. Video cameras mounted in the park's parking lots last month revealed the park's drop in po 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...mazing performance in the examinations. Therefore a holistic approach in appraising the t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, really, so, therefore, well, while, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2223.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 444.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00675675676 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98124276377 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47972972973 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.510564546 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.045454545 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254721352533 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087939788781 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382538604653 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148510407058 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457544991464 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.