Technology is made to simplify our lives, but it complicates our lives.
Currently, technology is a huge part of our lives. Everywhere we turn, there is a computer device that can tell us what time it is by being voice-activated. We can talk to our friends or family from across the world at ease due to the technology we have today. This is an ongoing issue because some people are not a fan of having a device that we can store all of our information in. I believe that technology is made to make our lives easier, but it can sometimes make our lives more complicated if we are unorganized or running low on battery.
Having our appointments in hand or being able to access our email quickly, are just some of the few perks of having technology at our fingertips. We do not have to lug around maps when we travel, we can just pull up the map on our phones. We no longer have to write to our friends or families, we can just send a text. Technology makes communication way easier than it used to be before.
Although made to simplify our lives, technology makes our lives more complicated than it should be because of the wide array of applications that can be saved onto a phone. Nowadays, people have a laptop, a cellphone, and a tablet. Due to multiple devices, it may start to get difficult to find which device has the document saved in. If a person is not organized, it can get complicated trying to locate a document because they will begin to look at every single app that could possibly have it.
Since we put our whole lives into our devices, if it runs out of battery, we are doomed. Having our phones help us write appointments or small notes so easily that we begin to rely on them. Rather than writing it down in a planner, we instantly turn to our phones to figure out what we have going on next. This can be a complication because, without our devices, we may be lost. For example, having a GPS, an automated mapping device is beneficial because we do not have to put much thought into thinking about what streets to take. Without this GPS, we would be lost and would not know how to get back home.
Having technology around us is both beneficial and consequential. We trust these devices to get us home from a long trip or be able to send a message to our friends. Technology has become a huge part of our lives that we invest in it without even thinking of the consequences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-15 | guozhishan | 66 | view |
| 2024-04-12 | Zahid6400 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 33 | view |
| 2024-02-01 | jahot | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-01 | jahot | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e to access our email quickly, are just some of the few perks of having technology at our f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
... begin to look at every single app that could possibly have it. Since we put our whole liv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hout even thinking of the consequences.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 67.0 33.0505617978 203% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.3801843318 5.05705443957 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60326349484 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472350230415 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6861072053 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.4090909091 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.59090909091 5.21951772744 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312471226037 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115648915703 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122921906989 0.0758088955206 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208478426186 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665649399922 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 14.1392134831 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 12.1639044944 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.