Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.
In today's tech-savvy ear, it is impossible to exclude various technologies from our lives. As it is wisely said, necessity is the mother of invention; humans invented technology to make their lives easier. It is possible today to complete any task using your mobile phone or computer at the tip of your fingers. It won't be incorrect to say that technology has made our lives simpler and more manageable.
Let us take the example of automobile industries, a vast number of complicated and hazardous tasks have been made automated. A place where a human otherwise would have spent unnecessary efforts now has robots. Even in the field of education, technology has proved to be a great boon. The tedious task of researching a topic is now so easy, thanks to the internet. Powerful search engines now provide any information within milliseconds.
Moreover, everyday activities like booking a cab, ordering food, communicating with a colleague have become so simplified that even a child can do it. Mobile phones nowadays have personal assistants who remind you of your appointments. Hence, one can focus on his work and let the background activities be completed automatically.
Nonetheless, such a high dependency on technology is indeed dangerous. Say, for example, there is some glitch in the system, and the automated tasks fail. It would be more difficult to be resilient to such damages.
Letting a computer system control one's life means compromising his privacy. Leaking of this private information is another risk to consider. A lot of laymen find it challenging to use the available technologies and thus leading to a lot of complications. Understanding the system, then becomes an additional task.
Therefore one can conclude that technology like a coin has two sides. It has indeed made our lives better and lucid, but it has its disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | Siddiqur Rahman | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | phajaygv | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Evil-wasp | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | xipaheje | 16 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 35, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s. Letting a computer system control ones life means compromising his privacy. Le...
^^^^
Line 15, column 178, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
...er. A lot of laymen find it challenging to use the available technologies and thus lea...
^^^^^^
Line 19, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
..., then becomes an additional task. Therefore one can conclude that technology like a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, mind you
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 303.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18811881188 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07927689798 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627062706271 0.4932671777 127% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.564194139 60.3974514979 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.8571428571 118.986275619 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4285714286 23.4991977007 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52380952381 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109253403564 0.243740707755 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305468408471 0.0831039109588 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578300529589 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0556464983911 0.150359130593 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672461940987 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 48.8420337079 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.23 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.