Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The technology developed by Wright Brothers during 18th century for enabling people to fly like birds and travel across the world within few hours has made the business travels and leisure travels not only possible, but also comfortable and less time consuming. While there are no reservations that technology has been improving and making lives of many people easy, there are reasons to believe that it is also making lives of regulators, such as financial or banking, complex and difficult to endure. The recent raucous of election meddling in USA that erupted in 2018 confirms that the technology, such as of gathering data from people without their consent and using it for illicit purpose, making the life of federal agencies tough since hackers are cleverly finding their way out of their grips.
The first reason that supports the idea of technology is bane is that with the advent of high frequency trading, which is nothing but another technology innovation of stock market, the money of investors are not safe, since traders are creating and using complex algorithms which are recondite to these investors. Moreover, federal agencies, such as Securities Exchange Boards and Federal Reserve, are not in a position to comprehend the underlying structure of securities which is convolutedly interlinked with other securities of the world markets. A good example of this is the ban of high frequency trading that was implemented by Government of India in 2018, since traders were using illicit hacking of the market information by using the technology that was delivering the relevant information to these traders before information released to public. Therefore, technology is creating a problem by superseding and deceiving the regulators.
Another reason that buttresses the thought of restricting the use of technology is that it is exacerbating the problem of bank frauds while conducting transactions on internet. With the advent of technology of sending or transferring money within fraction of seconds, the money of depositors are more vulnerable than ever. It is widely believed that hackers can intrude in the banking circles, despite several steps taken by banks to prevent such moves, with advanced technology such as by creating by fake internet links and website. This can be illustrated by the incident that was occurred in 2014 in India when Banks in India offered seamless transfer of money without going or coming to the bank. The result was that a group of internet hackers created a fake website, pretending to be a bank, and deceived people by transacting their money through this fake bank. Hence, technology is deceiving people more than helping them.
However, one reason that argues that technology is making life easier is that with the advent of technology the agriculture production is increasing. Earlier, farmers in India were reluctant to store their produce, since no technology was there to inform them about the patterns of rainfall in the coming months that made them to sell immediately their produce lest unprecedented rain would damage the crops. However, with the introduction of live feeds through satellite images of clouds and analysis of past data, the farmers are acting prudently now and deciding which crop to harvest depending on the predicted amount of rainfall. For instance, before 1980, the amount of production of crops was worth 800 million rupees, however, when the technology was introduced, the production reached to 2100 million rupees in 1994. Hence, technology is filling the gap in the information that is necessary for people to live happily.
As can be seen from above paragraphs that although technology helping people to enjoy the prosperity now, it is creating unprecedented problems for regulators and fleecing people of money. Therefore, technology must be restricted only to the fields where advantages outweigh the problems.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-04 | phajaygv | 50 | view |
2019-10-10 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
2019-09-15 | ritobhash | 66 | view |
2019-09-15 | kanishkbar4321@gmail.com | 50 | view |
2019-09-12 | laurelstockwell | 50 | view |
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 66
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limi 89
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 66
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 66
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 40.0 19.5258426966 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.3162921348 230% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 102.0 58.6224719101 174% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3301.0 2235.4752809 148% => OK
No of words: 622.0 442.535393258 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30707395498 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.99398916966 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77933313454 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 299.0 215.323595506 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480707395498 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 1019.7 704.065955056 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.0087494684 60.3974514979 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.05 118.986275619 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1 23.4991977007 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0946251740709 0.243740707755 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334666501223 0.0831039109588 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292260825499 0.0758088955206 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0550047085072 0.150359130593 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219934903898 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 14.1392134831 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 169.0 100.480337079 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.