Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.
In the 1980s and early 1990s, many thought that the advent of a personal computer would be a short-lived experiment with little merit. Despite the naysayers, vanguards of the technological boom, like Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, steered a nation, lest the world at large, onto a path with brilliant path of innovaion. From the advent of the personal computer to cell phones, and wi-fi, billions of people around the world, and every nation, were transfromed from isolation to globalism. The speed at information is instananeously transmitted and shared benefits any inqusitive person who wishes to gain knowledge, or connect with distant family, and communicate with a plethora of people whether nearby or far away. While many of these benefits are efficient, instant gratification technology provides has negative, pernicious effects.
Psychologically, social media has a negative effect on human psyche. Studies have shown that though people may digitally feel connected to a network of peers, and strangers, the degredation of in-person social interaction can make a person feel isolated, disconnected from basic social interation. Further, by comparing one's self to long forgotten peers or more successful, beautiful, or affluent friends can trigger questions about self-worth, isolation, and depression. Social media has the ability to display class-stratification of peers whom otherwise would not be in a person's life. A barrage of envy has the ability to trun even the most jovial person lachrymose.
Though short-lived, instant gratification increases dopamine. Many apps and people use are designed to attract and gratify minds multiple times a day. While this may be a benefit in the moment, the crash from the positive effects of dopamine puts psyche into an unhealth upcycle, detrimental to health.
Lastly, the attraction to and use of social media may hinder personal privacy. The pernicious combination of oversharing and techological company's scouer for metadata makes the Freedom of Information act moot. Social security numbers, address, driver's license number, and other personal data are found on the deep web and can be used as espionage.
In closing, technology may make our lives faster, more accessible and easier, but there are significant trade offs. Psychologically there are negative ramifications and personal priviacy are placed at risk.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | Siddiqur Rahman | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | phajaygv | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Evil-wasp | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | xipaheje | 16 | view |
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's current headquarters. Moreover, Mi 69
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thought seems to be countable; consider using: 'many thoughts'.
Suggestion: many thoughts
In the 1980s and early 1990s, many thought that the advent of a personal computer ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ocial interation. Further, by comparing ones self to long forgotten peers or more su...
^^^^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... peers whom otherwise would not be in a persons life. A barrage of envy has the ability...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: IN_THE_MOMENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'at the moment' (=currently)?
Suggestion: at the moment
...imes a day. While this may be a benefit in the moment, the crash from the positive effects of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, may, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 33.0505617978 15% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 364.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54120879121 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.085314059 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618131868132 0.4932671777 125% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9453272716 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.055555556 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72222222222 5.21951772744 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0727575638186 0.243740707755 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0232297414214 0.0831039109588 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511283194269 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0523755454655 0.150359130593 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592443119027 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.38706741573 121% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.