Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.
The issue task states how technology while making our lives easier end up making complicated at the same time. While each side has its pros and cons, I strongly believe that technology is a gift. Furthermore, only with the help of technology, we are able to go along with our lives so easily.
First and foremost, technology educates us. 100 years ago only a select few were able to study. but now due to the advancement in technology, even the people residing in the remote corners in the world are able to gain access to knowledge. We also get to know what is happening on the earth that is invisible to the naked eye. For example, a documentary on the discovery channel described how the flora and fauna had adapted to the sub-zero temperature 6000meters below the Earth's surface.
Furthermore, technology has completely transformed the way we communicate with others. We get to speak to our friends who are residing on the other side of this planet. It is not only restricted to speech, but also video communication.
Lastly, the crop yield has been increased significantly. In the previous decade, if there were any pests, the solution was to spray the entire plantation with pesticides which in turn damages the crops. But now with the help of technology, we are able to prevent the pests from consuming the crops and at the same time avoiding the usage of pesticides. Only with the help of technology has the cost for harvesting crops has decreased significantly making food accessible to everybody.
Some may argue that technology is sustainable and helping to conserve the environment. But the very same technology is creating problems like global warming, ozone depletion, etc. This is very much like a coin having two sides. As long as there is something good, there is an equal amount of bad present. Also, technology has made the majority of the human population lethargic. Even to buy groceries, people are no longer willing to walk to the nearest stores. But still, scientists and researchers are trying to improve the versatility of technology so as to decrease the ill effects.
In conclusion, I would like to state that technology is a boon and not a bane.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | Siddiqur Rahman | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | phajaygv | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Evil-wasp | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | xipaheje | 16 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from the Board of Directors of Butler Manufacturing."During the past year, workers at Butler Manufacturing reported 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than workers at nearby Panoply Industries, where the work shifts 33
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 50
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...o only a select few were able to study. but now due to the advancement in technolog...
^^^
Line 9, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...od accessible to everybody. Some may argue that technology is sustainable and help...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 553, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...o improve the versatility of technology so as to decrease the ill effects. In conclus...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, lastly, may, so, still, while, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8927613941 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83581234947 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560321715818 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4190894363 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.347826087 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2173913043 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30434782609 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142116853398 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348449535135 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610427285812 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0750509769436 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967080574705 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.