television is entirely democratic in that its content is controlled by what the people want
Television has advanced from a box-looking object to a flat screen mounted on the wall.
It is still debatable over the pros and cons of this technological invention. Today, it is indisputable that almost every household owns a television. Television networks and broadcast companies control the supply of the content to the televisions. These broadcasters are widely criticized by viewers for their content. The viewers believe there remains (is)autocracy in (content selection) the selection of the content to be broadcasted for the following four reasons.
Firstly, it is to be understood that every broadcasting company has a profit agenda. Contents are chosen based on the revenue it earns per episode. Consumers are given no choice for content selection. For example, reality television is commanding the entertainment industry and there is a large population who dislike it.
Secondly, the broadcasting companies and the production houses are slowly abolishing certain genres and changing the trend of the industry. These corporations are seeking profits hence have vested interests towards certain popular artists. For example, the launch of MTV has boosted the pop and hip hop culture but has severely affected the rock music industry. Rock music is worshipped by a great percentage of the population. Many people believe that since the inception of MTV, artists have declined in rock but risen in pop.
Thirdly, the aforementioned businesses operate for profit. Advertisements are a good stream of revenue for television broadcasters. Nowadays television channels have more advertisement time than show run-time. This is not what any consumer wants but is forced to bear with these externalities.
Finally, there is no sense of democracy in the creation of the content. The producers create what they deem to be fitting. There is no channelization of thoughts with that of the public's opinion. This seems to be more tending towards an autocratic style rather than a democracy.
Therefore, the claim that 'television is entirely democratic in that its content is controlled by what the people want', is completely false. The decision and the control of the content lie with the broadcasting network companies and the producers. Decisions taken by these companies are motivated by profit and not on the likes of the public.
- Learning is primarily a matter of personal discipline; students cannot be motivated by school or college alone.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position y 58
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 58
- Governments should offer free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 50
- “The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities.” 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntent. The viewers believe there remains isautocracy in content selection the sel...
^^
Line 10, column 180, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...nelization of thoughts with that of the publics opinion. This seems to be more tending ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, hence, look, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, third, thirdly, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 12.4196629213 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1978.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 366.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4043715847 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0523613859 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543715846995 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2598812059 60.3974514979 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.0769230769 118.986275619 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0769230769 23.4991977007 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311850426295 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751059509062 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141204573723 0.0758088955206 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142196538617 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140520022892 0.0667264976115 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 48.8420337079 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.