There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts — especially at a great cost in money and jobs — to save endangered animal or plant species.
The author here makes a statement that society should not go out-of-the-way in an attempt to save the endangered plants and animals, especially if it has any negative impact on human beings, in terms of money or profession. Such a statement can never be agreed to by any person with a reasonable state of mind. At the most, only a highly qualified version of this statement may be eligible for initiating a debate.
In the first place, all plants and animals, including us, are creations of our mother nature. We have no right to harm other species, or take any steps that can cause their extinction. Even then, we have made tens of thousands of fauna and flora extinct, or in verge of extinction. It is time when the great nations have realized this, and collaborative schemes are being launched to retain these species. We have at last accepted that, creating a balance in nature is very much needed for our own benefit. At such a time, evoking a completely negative debate, as done by the author’s assertion here, can never be subscribed to.
It is quite possible that, in order to retain the endangered animals or plants, human kind may need some sacrifice. There are many places with man-animal conflict. If we want to save tigers, we have to give up some land, impacting the local people who may lose their earnings and also place of stay. There are waters across the world which are to be given to crocodiles, in order to enhance their numbers. But then, a number of fishermen’s livelihood will be in great trouble. The situation takes a new dimension when we consider that these impacted people are often very poor and cannot afford to move out on their own without support from government. While these are some genuine issues that need to be addressed, there are poacher all over the world, who kill animals indiscriminately, for their skin or tooth or other body parts. They have no approval from the governments, and are to be denounced and interdicted.
Our job is to strike a good balance between these issues, and probably the plants and animals should get priority, given the injustice that has been done to them over centuries. Men can move to other places with prospects of another professions, but tigers cannot leave forests or crocodiles cannot leave waters. Plants grow in specific climatic conditions, and we cannot outroot them. With all our new technological advances, it should not be very difficult to find an alternate home for a human, but our animals and plants do not entertain such advantages.
We keep missing the extinct species. We cannot afford to lose the endangered species any more. All over the world, tigers have been very few in numbers, and we should immediately take enough steps to rehabilitate them. So is true for many other gifts of nature. The assertion made by the author cannot be disagreed more.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-01 | geek_devshree | 58 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | brijeshshah41 | 50 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | brijeshshah41 | 16 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | brijeshshah41 | 16 | view |
| 2019-06-10 | hvarpe | 16 | view |
- 1.Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another. 16
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts — especially at a great cost in money and jobs — to save endangered animal or plant species. 58
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country. 50
- Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulty obtaining reliable supplies of high-quality wool fabric, we discontinued production of our popular alpaca overcoat. Now that we have a new fabric supplier, we should resume production. Given the outcry from 81
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts — especially at a great cost in money and jobs — to save endangered animal or plant species. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t. If we want to save tigers, we have to give up some land, impacting the local p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, then, while, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2376.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 493.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81947261663 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68971330083 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513184584178 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 758.7 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6660045036 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3846153846 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9615384615 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.38461538462 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160182230933 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421205239099 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426080241003 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928711399487 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392883063847 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.