There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts — especially at a great cost in money and jobs — to save endangered animal or plant species.
The issue states that it is absurd to invest in saving or protecting endangered species by utilizing valuable resources in bid to protect
or help species grow. The statement is unjustified. As efforts though few times useless many a times gives required or favourable outcomes.
investing done is generally fruitful if directed in correct direction and properly implemented. And even though if there is low hopes the society
should have full faith in it.
The protection of rhino in indonesia which began in 1974 have now started to show result after 20 years of work done by locals in collabartion
with the government to save the endangered species at the start people did not believe in getting results. people thought that the implementation
of such programs would ultimately result in waste of valuable resources which could be used otherwise. This exemplifies that even though
the result are not reflected the government should be continously work for it.
Similarly, The protection of lions which took place in 90's in south africa when hunting of lions by poachers was at peak resulted in
plummet of population of lions in the reserve. then, the government implemented certain rules to further decrease the loss of species. because
of which the popluation started to stabilize and now its is gradually increasing. now, The wildlife of south africa is booming. And the resulting income from it is major
part of countries economy.
Also, even though the effort are futile, people are obligied to invest in such activities because humans are the primary cause of such effects thus
humans are the major culprits of such problems.it is the moral duties of humans to correct their wrongs even though it does not provide desirable outcomes
Although, generally it is better to make judicious decision rather than based on pure emotion. when there is irreversible damage done to species
it is useless to further invest in such project when it does not provide fertile outcomes. In Australia similar situtaion occured when the population
of rats increased rapidly which were foreign species began to harm or destroy the native species which result in destruction of indigenious species
even though the government had tried to make efforts which were ultimately futile. government refrained from investing in it because the damage
cannot be reversed to original state.
Thus if there even the slightest of chances of survival of reverting back the damage done by human activities the government or other should
put all the efforts to control the further losses and then after damage control should to worry about proliferation of the species.
But will protecting the species government should not take decision based on pure emotions rather look into all possible solutions and
trade off of investing in such a programes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-01 | geek_devshree | 58 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | brijeshshah41 | 50 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | brijeshshah41 | 16 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | brijeshshah41 | 16 | view |
| 2019-06-10 | hvarpe | 16 | view |
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 50
- Scandals-whether in politics, academia, or other area-can be useful. They focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could." 66
- It is better for people to move out of their hometown when they become adults, instead of staying in their home communities for their whole lives. 70
- Success in any realm of life comes more often from taking chances or risks than from careful and cautious planning." 66
- The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing valuable resources in bid to protect or help species grow. The statement is u...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Investing
...gives required or favourable outcomes. investing done is generally fruitful if directed ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ple did not believe in getting results. people thought that the implementation of suc...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rwise. This exemplifies that even though the result are not reflected the governm...
^^^
Line 13, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions by poachers was at peak resulted in plummet of population of lions in the re...
^^^
Line 14, column 48, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Then
... of population of lions in the reserve. then, the government implemented certain rul...
^^^^
Line 14, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...o further decrease the loss of species. because of which the popluation started to sta...
^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 83, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Now
...ze and now its is gradually increasing. now, The wildlife of south africa is boomin...
^^^
Line 15, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wildlife of south africa is booming. And the resulting income from it is major p...
^^
Line 23, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...oes not provide desirable outcomes Although, generally it is better to make judicio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 23, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...sion rather than based on pure emotion. when there is irreversible damage done to sp...
^^^^
Line 23, column 96, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “when” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...sion rather than based on pure emotion. when there is irreversible damage done to sp...
^^^^
Line 26, column 84, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Government
...e efforts which were ultimately futile. government refrained from investing in it because ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 26, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... from investing in it because the damage cannot be reversed to original state. ...
^^^
Line 30, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...not be reversed to original state. Thus if there even the slightest of chances ...
^^^^
Line 32, column 10, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'protect'
Suggestion: protect
...roliferation of the species. But will protecting the species government should not take ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, similarly, so, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2420.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 460.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26086956522 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69545581333 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491304347826 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 93.5718427236 60.3974514979 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.368421053 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2105263158 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42105263158 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 23.0 4.97078651685 463% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 16.0 7.80617977528 205% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0755906965026 0.243740707755 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0213638571359 0.0831039109588 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0220862731036 0.0758088955206 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0217672151445 0.150359130593 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268815946853 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.