Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
The issue states that the critical judgment of work in any field has little or no value if it is not presented by a person knowledge or is a expert of the field. The statement correctly captures the importance of insights or knowledge of a person in making judgments about any works. The knowledge of a person helps in identifying subtle distinction in any field or work. The literary critics of well known arts are far more aware of finding the foible in a art work but for that they need to have strong understanding of the art work.
In the field of sports, There are pundits who are vocal critics of the performance of a team they judge each and every move of the teams and time and time question the ability of coach and the players' decision making. In football, specially the pundits starts analyzing the various strategy adopted by the coach, look at the current scenario and also the efficiency of outcomes. But for that pundits must be aware of the game and should have had first hand experience of the game. Then and then there comments are considered to be valid. Someone not watching or following the game cannot make comments on the strategy. there comments would be considered trivial.
Also, In the fields of arts where art appraisal judge the painting and then pass reviews of the painting also needs to have insights of the painting. Knowledge about what the artist wants to express. They should be able to understand the expressions of the artist similarly when book reviewers read the book for review they should be able to get feeling of what the authors wants to pass through the book. They should be able to relate to the book. Otherwise the review of the book would result in a pretentious result not providing the true meaning and the credentials of the critic would drop.
Though the statement truly states that the author's insights are need for making a judgement, Sometimes even having insights and knowledge the critics fails to sound judgement ,Sometimes there knowledge betrays them they often do not understand the work and then pass fallacious judgement. Thus it is absolutely necessary to have insights and knowledge it does not guarantee it passing tenable judgement. Also someone from outside may try to find the flaws in works and may do so efficiently. Companies assign other companies to find the flaws in their company even though the other company is not related to their field or domain. These other hired companies perform black box testing in which they check the performance of the companies various aspects which is quite similar in each companies rather than focusing on the specific fields of that company. They do that successfully without having insights of the company.
Finally, In conclusion the issue correctly identify the need to have background knowledge and a depth knowledge of the field in order to pass a judicious judgement. Still it does not guarantee the of passing of always a sound judgement. Knowledge as well as discern is required in order to make a critical judgement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | jinjer | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | __annabelle__ | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
- Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammalsthat keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humansare endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, nomatter whether the environment is warm or cold. Becausedinosaurs were re 73
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts — especially at a great cost in money and jobs — to save endangered animal or plant species. 16
- The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago, it caused much concern because sea ot 73
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 50
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts — especially at a great cost in money and jobs — to save endangered animal or plant species. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t presented by a person knowledge or is a expert of the field. The statement corr...
^
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...on in making judgments about any works. The knowledge of a person helps in identify...
^^^
Line 1, column 373, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ubtle distinction in any field or work. The literary critics of well known arts are...
^^^
Line 1, column 457, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...far more aware of finding the foible in a art work but for that they need to have...
^
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'Someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'watches'.
Suggestion: watches
...are considered to be valid. Someone not watching or following the game cannot make comme...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 620, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...e cannot make comments on the strategy. there comments would be considered trivial. ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...y should be able to relate to the book. Otherwise the review of the book would result in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...dge the critics fails to sound judgement ,Sometimes there knowledge betrays them t...
^^
Line 7, column 290, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ork and then pass fallacious judgement. Thus it is absolutely necessary to have insi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
...n pass fallacious judgement. Thus it is absolutely necessary to have insights and knowledge it does ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 405, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...guarantee it passing tenable judgement. Also someone from outside may try to find th...
^^^^
Line 9, column 166, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...in order to pass a judicious judgement. Still it does not guarantee the of passing of...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, may, similarly, so, still, then, thus, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2529.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 523.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83556405354 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5800081935 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.428298279159 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 765.9 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3475313033 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.375 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7916666667 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45833333333 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191929063748 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056755334865 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959447351671 0.0758088955206 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111184821438 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105508893527 0.0667264976115 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.