Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Well, the statement provided holds true through multiple living examples around us. Apple Inc. wouldn't have existed today had Steve Jobs given in to all the criticism in the early days. Neither would Tata Motors, the first car manufacturing company in India, if Ratan Tata had even pricked his ears on all the questions raised on his idea.
Hence, I definitely agree that if one believes in his or her idea or has unrequited passion for something, he or she must definitely pursue it by lending deaf ears to the society. For the society is always there to question your motive or ability to achieve what you believe, one must remain steadfast and focussed in achieving his or her goal. It is through this steady and focussed approach that people like Steve Jobs and Ratan Tata have been able to accomplish their dreams. They are some of the greatest leaders and ideators that the world has seen until today. A leader by nature is passionate and hungry to learn and create more. It is this passion and hunger that deafens all the surrounding criticism and ascends to success.
However, passion for one thing is good but obstinacy can be detrimental. I believe, in order to be successful, one must be open to positive criticism. This can help the individual to reconsider some aspects which he or she may have overlooked in the blind process of achieving his or her goal. For example, if someone (who is a great dancer) wants to pursue a career in performing arts, he or she must be pragmatic in his or her consideration of how to achieve the same. One can't expect sudden fame or money from such a career. It is a hard earned journey.
Hence, in summary, one must continue to ideate along with taking in criticisms positively in order to reach their goals successfully.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-06 | rahatumar9072 | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Ruhani | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | jayauen | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | the.umair__ | 75 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | keisham | 70 | view |
- Those who see their ideas through regardless of doubts or criticism others may express are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy 50
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and char 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...e living examples around us. Apple Inc. wouldnt have existed today had Steve Jobs given...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...eration of how to achieve the same. One cant expect sudden fame or money from such a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, look, may, so, well, for example, in summary, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 312.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6891025641 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54631450096 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.813889906 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4375 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114448881127 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320474652369 0.0831039109588 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0235681469576 0.0758088955206 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07110223872 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155446721838 0.0667264976115 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.