True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
If goals were to define the success, than the one who had set very high goals and has underachieved would be unsuccessful and one with very minute goals; frequently achieving them would be super successful. It is very important to know the definition of success as per ones own point of view. For a poor guy, achieving the goal of having consistent 3 times meal for his family, a house to live, and education for children could be the idea of success while for someone else being capable of having luxury cars, huge villa and large number of domestic maids would mean success. That is why goals cannot be considered as primary measure of one's success but they can definitely reflect the achieve-ability of that person.
Additionally, people can have no idea of what to expect from themselves that is why they end up either over-expecting or under-expecting from themselves. This difference between the practicality and self expectations render the 'goals' unreliable as a primary measure of one's success. Take for an example if the Indian cricketer Virat Kohli sets goal to break every record that a well known former cricketer Sachin Tendulkar has set, Virat will find himself underacheiving in most of the situations, while he could be the best batsman of his time. But the higher set goals would never give him the sense of success.
On the other hand, if some one ends up setting targets way below their capability they will have a fallacious idea of success. They might find themselves overwhelmed with success but in reality, would have been achieving nothing. Take for an example a minister in India Mr. Arvind Kejriwal is well known for his habit of over-advertising his puny achievements. This creates a dilemma for citizens they find the minister bragging about their well accomplished jobs but nothing around them changes to abate their day to day problems.
Furthermore, several circumstance have set people aside from the path of achieving their targets, but they have found themselves capable of performing very well on this new precarious roads performing without setting any targets. If the theory in discussion was true this kind of people would be nothing more than abject failures.
Conclusively, it is very important to know what your idea of success is and what are your capabilities to set goals and then to start to pursue them, to measure the success on achievement-of-goals basis.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-25 | irineti | 33 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | nischalbaral609@gmail.com | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | xs8091 | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | Raj.shikhar.gupta | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | wenye | 58 | view |
- Some people believe that competition for high grades motivates students to excel in the classroom. Others believe that such competition seriously limits the quality of real learning.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with 83
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In 66
- TPO21 – Independent: A/D? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 80
- The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim 50
- About us 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
If goals were to define the success, than the one who had set very high goals and...
^^^^
Line 1, column 475, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[4]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
... idea of success while for someone else being capable of having luxury cars, huge vil...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 639, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...not be considered as primary measure of ones success but they can definitely reflect...
^^^^
Line 2, column 269, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...oals unreliable as a primary measure of ones success. Take for an example if the Ind...
^^^^
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...ense of success. On the other hand, if some one ends up setting targets way below their...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 14, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun circumstance seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some circumstance'.
Suggestion: some circumstance
...heir day to day problems. Furthermore, several circumstance have set people aside from the path of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 230, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...performing without setting any targets. If the theory in discussion was true this ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, then, well, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2009.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98511166253 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91364379654 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531017369727 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7545483079 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.933333333 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8666666667 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212976923026 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804946253607 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421927371536 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124894251233 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507576406457 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.