Type your essay into the provided editor The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead

Essay topics:

Type your essay into the provided editor.
The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.

Many would assert the best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead because the leaders can achieve the ultimate goal more efficiently along less complains from other people, and I believe all leaders should at least listen any, whether it is positive or negative, feedbacks from the people whom they lead. I am going to enumerate several reason why I bolster the arugnment.

Of course, since the leader positions contains counltess duties, they cannot always encounter all feedbacks. Even, not all feedbacks indicates its necessity and usefulness. For example, let's assume a situation which one employee in a certain company continue to maintain his idea that the company should give increase his wage ten times more although he is infamous for being lazy and dull. In such a implausible secnario, the leaders cannot accept the claim because it is absurad.

Notwithstanding the fact the partial portion of feedbacks is not going be reliable and the leaders cannot recognize all opinions, I argue that the leaders should at least try to collect people's opinions to check their general trend such as to confirm the right direction which is not against the employees. If there is one common vocies when the leaders collect feedbacks, the opinion will guide the direction exactly. While there will be wasteful feedbacks, there are going to be extremely insightful opinions that the leaders can apply and deliberate. Gathering these clever ideas is more beneficial than dealing with negative and abashed feedbacks, and because of its more benefits, the leaders need to still encourage feedbacks from the people whom they lead.

In addition, since higher positions tend to be less involved with real field, it is harder for leaders to know exact situations; this is the most critical reason why the best leaders should encourage feedbacks. Even more candid, receving feedbacks should be one of primacy responsiblities for the leaders. Even if the leaders are not going to take consideration for all opinions, they should aware of opponents' ideas. The best embodiment is the presidents of any countries. Since each country is huge scale and involves many citizens, it is hard to concilitate people into one opinion and it is not possible in reality. Still, the presidents will consider citizens' opinions and are going to generalize the most common opinions in order to introude new policy. Making a decesion soely based on one leader's opinions is too deleterious, and feedbacks from the people whom they lead will act as the best guidline.

To sum up, despite of unuseful and abashed feedbacks , the leaders strongly encouraged to collect a wide range of feedbacks from the people whom they lead in order to make a decesion wiser and effective. It will engender better outcome for a group and to the leaders itself, eventually, and people will call those as the best leaders.

Votes
Average: 5.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-05-11 rahatumar9072 58 view
2023-08-25 Ruhani 66 view
2023-07-19 jayauen 62 view
2022-08-15 ajay@123 66 view
2022-07-04 sag15 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user jxp018 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...famous for being lazy and dull. In such a implausible secnario, the leaders canno...
^
Line 9, column 53, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...espite of unuseful and abashed feedbacks , the leaders strongly encouraged to coll...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, while, as to, at least, for example, in addition, of course, such as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2435.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 477.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10482180294 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63435644161 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488469601677 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 750.6 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.9053208183 60.3974514979 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.157894737 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1052631579 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94736842105 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346028200874 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10702032447 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115584266633 0.0758088955206 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23397644014 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116726731708 0.0667264976115 175% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.