Critical characteristics of any society lie in traditional places. However, it is not uncommon for tourists or even natives to travel to places that positively reflect the culture of their country. The prompt recommends that to study the long-established customs one must explore more about the major cities. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this suggestion and argue that one must look inward rather than outward when researching more about the important characteristics of society for two reasons.
Firstly, all major cities where urbanization and development have taken a faster pace are now converting into major political and technological centers. People all around the world are now traveling to developed countries to begin a quiet and steady life by getting a regular job. For example, every major city like Mumbai in India or Paris in France provides the best amenities and facilities, which attracts more and more people to improve their socioeconomic status. Due to commercialization and the growing need of each city to compete with each other in the race to be the best, they are not capable of capturing the true essence of their society.
Secondly, small towns and rural cities provide a closer look into the cultural heritage. More than 70 percent of the native population lives in those towns. These towns offer the most visible characteristics of a society and the role played by it in history. For example, small towns like Nashik in India still have preserved the stories and relics from the era when gods lived with their ancestors till the second world war. All traditions are still been followed which shows how the ancestors used to live and the festivals are also celebrated with the importance they had in history. To truly understand the society and background, it is necessary to visit the countryside and further explore the cities to learn more about their culture, heritage, and past.
Of course, some argue that the study of the capitals of every country sums up all the features and displays them precisely in museums or art galleries. However, isn't that precisely why we should visit and study more about the rural area? If we do so, we are likely to learn more about the culture, not the one fabricated for everyone's interest. Furthermore, studying rural cities is always a must in understanding the most important characteristics of a society.
- Claim Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience Reason People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agr 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting you 66
- Requiring university students to take a variety of courses outside their major fields of study is the best way to ensure that students become truly educated Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 58
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 50
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy At the same time manufacturers are now marketing many home applianc 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...y in museums or art galleries. However, isnt that precisely why we should visit and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, for example, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06835443038 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83844777502 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539240506329 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4299806249 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.222222222 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9444444444 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200717016268 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632018880178 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520529618064 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12366949916 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350840669566 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.