Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
I do not agree that there is no use of the past for those in current positions of leadership.
Leadership quality is an important ability of humans. A leader shows the opportunity that is coming ahead. A leader also embraces the difficulties that fall on the way of his or her journey and finds a way out to overcome these difficulties. A leader also finds the hidden ability from his or her follower.
To become a great leader, the past has a great impact. Through the turmoils of the past, a leader molds himself. Analyzing the past occurrences a leader decides what to do or what not to do. A successful decision makes him or her a great leader. But a successful decision or wise decision comes through previous experiences from the past. Suppose, a leader comes across a difficult problem. He or she then maps the encountered problem with previous experiences he or she has experienced. Then analyzing every perspective, he comes up with a solution to overcome the encountered problem.
For example the father of the nation of Bangladesh, gifted Bangladesh with independence. In responding to his call for war, people jumped out for participating in the war. He has the immense capability to influence people and taking the right decision. This power of making the right decision has come with experience. Before becoming the father of the nation, he has 30 years of political past. Had he not used his political past he would not be able to take the right decision and influence people to participate in war. Every great leader has used the past to practice great leadership.
Without using the past the people who are in the current position of leadership would not be able to lead people and take the right decisions. If any leader does not use the past then there is very little chance that he will be a great leader.
Through the ups and downs of the past, a leader becomes a great leader. So I must say that there is a great use of the past for those who are in the current position of leadership.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-31 | rahatumar9072 | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Ruhani | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | prathiba_n | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | jayauen | 66 | view |
| 2023-03-08 | Shubhan Mital | 58 | view |
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership 50
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership 50
- Those who see their ideas through regardless of doubts or criticism others may express are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 243, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...way out to overcome these difficulties. A leader also finds the hidden ability fr...
^
Line 10, column 144, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ad people and take the right decisions. If any leader does not use the past then t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 357.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67226890756 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72290808447 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422969187675 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 525.6 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7341847333 60.3974514979 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.5 118.986275619 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.875 23.4991977007 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.21951772744 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267622746589 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890985248257 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137119497711 0.0758088955206 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225186284569 0.150359130593 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.174454113279 0.0667264976115 261% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 14.1392134831 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.21 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.